head to head · open source

Zellij vs Kitty

Zellij has 35,445 GitHub stars, 1,452 forks, 1,915 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Kitty has 34,947 stars, 1,513 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Zellij leads on adoption by 1% (35,445 vs 34,947 stars). Zellij is written in Rust under MIT; Kitty is written in Python under GPL-3.0. Zellij has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, Kitty 4%. Kitty was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (terminal), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Zellij ★ 35K Kitty ★ 35K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Zellij Kitty
GitHub stars ★ 35K ★ 35K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in Rust Python
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 1.5K ⑂ 1.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Zellij if

  • You weight community size — 35K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Zellij profile →

pick Kitty if

  • You want the Kitty feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and Kitty fits your workflow better

full Kitty profile →

About Zellij

Zellij is a terminal workspace and multiplexer written in Rust that gives developers, operations engineers, and anyone who loves the terminal built in layouts, tabs, panes, and a WebAssembly plugin system, built so that simplicity and power do not have to be traded against each other.

read the full Zellij overview →

About Kitty

Kitty is a GPU accelerated terminal emulator designed for power users who spend most of their time in the command line. It runs on Linux, macOS, and Windows, leveraging OpenGL for rendering to achieve high performance and responsiveness. Built in Python with performance critical components in C, it replaces slower, legacy terminal emulators by providing a modern, efficient foundation for interactive shell workflows.

read the full Kitty overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

alacritty vs zellij alacritty vs kitty warp vs zellij warp vs kitty ghostty vs zellij alacritty vs warp alacritty vs ghostty warp vs ghostty opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Terminals projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Terminals field.

Zellij vs Alacritty Zellij vs Warp Zellij vs Ghostty Zellij vs WezTerm Zellij vs WaveTerm Zellij vs iTerm 2

Frequently asked questions

Is Zellij or Kitty more popular?

Zellij has 35,445 GitHub stars and Kitty has 34,947. Zellij has the larger community by that measure.

Are Zellij and Kitty free?

Both are open source. Zellij is licensed under MIT and Kitty under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Zellij and Kitty?

Zellij is written in Rust and Kitty in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Zellij or Kitty?

Choose Zellij if you want the larger community (35,445 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Kitty if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.