head to head · open source

Alacritty vs Zellij

Alacritty has 65,752 GitHub stars, 3,613 forks, 340 open issues and last shipped 18 days ago. Zellij has 35,445 stars, 1,452 forks, 1,915 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Alacritty leads on adoption by 86% (65,752 vs 35,445 stars). Alacritty is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; Zellij is written in Rust under MIT. Alacritty has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Zellij 4%. Zellij was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (terminal), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Alacritty ★ 66K Zellij ★ 35K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Alacritty Zellij
GitHub stars ★ 66K ★ 35K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Rust Rust
Last push 2026-08-31 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 3.6K ⑂ 1.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Alacritty if

  • You weight community size — 66K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Alacritty profile →

pick Zellij if

  • You want the Zellij feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and Zellij fits your workflow better

full Zellij profile →

About Alacritty

Alacritty is a cross platform, GPU accelerated terminal emulator written in Rust and released under the Apache License 2.0, aimed at developers and system administrators on BSD, Linux, macOS, and Windows who want fast terminal rendering and are willing to let a window manager or terminal multiplexer handle tabs and splits.

read the full Alacritty overview →

About Zellij

Zellij is a terminal workspace and multiplexer written in Rust that gives developers, operations engineers, and anyone who loves the terminal built in layouts, tabs, panes, and a WebAssembly plugin system, built so that simplicity and power do not have to be traded against each other.

read the full Zellij overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

alacritty vs warp alacritty vs ghostty alacritty vs kitty warp vs zellij ghostty vs zellij warp vs ghostty warp vs kitty opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode langflow vs supabase

More Terminals projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Terminals field.

Alacritty vs Warp Alacritty vs Ghostty Alacritty vs Kitty Alacritty vs WezTerm Alacritty vs WaveTerm Alacritty vs iTerm 2

Frequently asked questions

Is Alacritty or Zellij more popular?

Alacritty has 65,752 GitHub stars and Zellij has 35,445. Alacritty has the larger community by that measure.

Are Alacritty and Zellij free?

Both are open source. Alacritty is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Zellij under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Alacritty and Zellij?

Alacritty is written in Rust and Zellij in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Alacritty or Zellij?

Choose Alacritty if you want the larger community (65,752 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Zellij if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.