head to head · open source

yazi vs OpenCloud

yazi has 42,278 GitHub stars, 1,022 forks, 65 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OpenCloud has 6,021 stars, 242 forks, 449 open issues and last shipped yesterday. yazi leads on adoption by 602% (42,278 vs 6,021 stars). yazi is written in Rust under MIT; OpenCloud is written in Go under Apache-2.0. yazi has attracted 2% as many forks as stars, OpenCloud 4%. OpenCloud was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

yazi ★ 42K OpenCloud ★ 6.0K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

yazi OpenCloud
GitHub stars ★ 42K ★ 6.0K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Rust Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 1.0K ⑂ 242
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick yazi if

  • You weight community size — 42K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full yazi profile →

pick OpenCloud if

  • You want the OpenCloud feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and OpenCloud fits your workflow better

full OpenCloud profile →

About yazi

Yazi is a terminal file manager written in Rust on non blocking async I/O, aimed at developers and command line users who want fast, customizable file browsing without leaving the terminal.

read the full yazi overview →

About OpenCloud

OpenCloud is an open source platform for file management, sharing and collaboration, positioned as a self hosted alternative built for digital sovereignty. The project lives in the Productivity & Utilities / File Management & Sync category of the open source ecosystem, and the repository in question is the main repository of the OpenCloud server: it contains the Go codebase for the backend services that the rest of the platform is built on. The server is released under the Apache 2.0 licence, and the wider project is backed by OpenCloud GmbH, with documentation and installation guidance published at opencloud.eu …

read the full OpenCloud overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs opencloud localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs seafile localsend vs pairdrop localsend vs owncloud localsend vs sync-in localsend vs hoodik openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

yazi vs LocalSend yazi vs rclone yazi vs copyparty yazi vs Files yazi vs Spacedrive yazi vs Nextcloud yazi vs uppy yazi vs cloudreve yazi vs Seafile yazi vs PairDrop yazi vs dufs yazi vs cyberduck

Frequently asked questions

Is yazi or OpenCloud more popular?

yazi has 42,278 GitHub stars and OpenCloud has 6,021. yazi has the larger community by that measure.

Are yazi and OpenCloud free?

Both are open source. yazi is licensed under MIT and OpenCloud under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between yazi and OpenCloud?

yazi is written in Rust and OpenCloud in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, yazi or OpenCloud?

Choose yazi if you want the larger community (42,278 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose OpenCloud if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.