head to head · open source

yazi vs cyberduck

yazi has 42,278 GitHub stars, 1,022 forks, 65 open issues and last shipped yesterday. cyberduck has 4,786 stars, 369 forks, 506 open issues and last shipped yesterday. yazi leads on adoption by 783% (42,278 vs 4,786 stars). yazi is written in Rust under MIT; cyberduck is written in Java under GPL-3.0. yazi has attracted 2% as many forks as stars, cyberduck 8%. cyberduck was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

yazi ★ 42K cyberduck ★ 4.8K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

yazi cyberduck
GitHub stars ★ 42K ★ 4.8K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in Rust Java
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 1.0K ⑂ 369
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick yazi if

  • You weight community size — 42K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full yazi profile →

pick cyberduck if

  • You want the cyberduck feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and cyberduck fits your workflow better

full cyberduck profile →

About yazi

Yazi is a terminal file manager written in Rust on non blocking async I/O, aimed at developers and command line users who want fast, customizable file browsing without leaving the terminal.

read the full yazi overview →

About cyberduck

Cyberduck is a libre FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, Amazon S3, Backblaze B2, Microsoft Azure & OneDrive and OpenStack Swift file transfer client for macOS and Windows, released under the GNU General Public License version 3 and developed at the iterate ch/cyberduck repository.

read the full cyberduck overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs seafile localsend vs pairdrop localsend vs opencloud localsend vs owncloud localsend vs sync-in localsend vs hoodik openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

yazi vs LocalSend yazi vs rclone yazi vs copyparty yazi vs Files yazi vs Spacedrive yazi vs Nextcloud yazi vs uppy yazi vs cloudreve yazi vs Seafile yazi vs PairDrop yazi vs dufs yazi vs OpenCloud

Frequently asked questions

Is yazi or cyberduck more popular?

yazi has 42,278 GitHub stars and cyberduck has 4,786. yazi has the larger community by that measure.

Are yazi and cyberduck free?

Both are open source. yazi is licensed under MIT and cyberduck under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between yazi and cyberduck?

yazi is written in Rust and cyberduck in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, yazi or cyberduck?

Choose yazi if you want the larger community (42,278 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose cyberduck if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.