head to head · open source

yazi vs cryfs

yazi has 42,303 GitHub stars, 1,023 forks, 65 open issues and last shipped yesterday. cryfs has 2,304 stars, 170 forks, 154 open issues and last shipped yesterday. yazi leads on adoption by 1,736% (42,303 vs 2,304 stars). yazi is written in Rust under MIT; cryfs is written in Rust under LGPL-3.0. yazi has attracted 2% as many forks as stars, cryfs 7%. yazi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (filesystem), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

yazi ★ 42K cryfs ★ 2.3K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

yazi cryfs
GitHub stars ★ 42K ★ 2.3K
License MIT LGPL-3.0
Written in Rust Rust
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 1.0K ⑂ 170
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick yazi if

  • You weight community size — 42K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full yazi profile →

pick cryfs if

  • You want the cryfs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the LGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and cryfs fits your workflow better

full cryfs profile →

About yazi

Yazi is a terminal file manager written in Rust on non blocking async I/O, aimed at developers and command line users who want fast, customizable file browsing without leaving the terminal.

read the full yazi overview →

About cryfs

CryFS is a FUSE based cryptographic filesystem written in Rust that encrypts a vault directory so it can be stored safely in cloud services such as Dropbox, iCloud, or OneDrive, and it is intended for Linux users who want their file contents, file sizes, directory structure, and metadata hidden from the storage provider rather than encrypted one file at a time.

read the full cryfs overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs seafile localsend vs pairdrop localsend vs opencloud localsend vs owncloud localsend vs sync-in localsend vs hoodik openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

yazi vs LocalSend yazi vs rclone yazi vs copyparty yazi vs Files yazi vs Spacedrive yazi vs Nextcloud yazi vs uppy yazi vs cloudreve yazi vs superfile yazi vs ranger yazi vs Seafile yazi vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is yazi or cryfs more popular?

yazi has 42,303 GitHub stars and cryfs has 2,304. yazi has the larger community by that measure.

Are yazi and cryfs free?

Both are open source. yazi is licensed under MIT and cryfs under LGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between yazi and cryfs?

yazi is written in Rust and cryfs in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, yazi or cryfs?

Choose yazi if you want the larger community (42,303 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose cryfs if its feature set, stack or LGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.