head to head · open source
webtorrent vs qutebrowser
webtorrent has 31,469 GitHub stars, 2,852 forks, 83 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. qutebrowser has 11,737 stars, 1,141 forks, 1,335 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. webtorrent leads on adoption by 168% (31,469 vs 11,737 stars). webtorrent is written in JavaScript under MIT; qutebrowser is written in Python under GPL-3.0. webtorrent has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, qutebrowser 10%. webtorrent was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| webtorrent | qutebrowser | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 31K | ★ 12K |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.9K | ⑂ 1.1K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick webtorrent if
- You weight community size — 31K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick qutebrowser if
- You want the qutebrowser feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and qutebrowser fits your workflow better
About webtorrent
WebTorrent The streaming torrent client. For node.js and the web. Sponsored by WebTorrent is a streaming torrent client for node.js and the browser . YEP, THAT'S RIGHT. THE BROWSER. It's written completely in JavaScript – the language of the web – so the same code works in both runtimes. In node.js, this module is a simple torrent client, using TCP and UDP to talk to other torrent clients. In the browser, WebTorrent uses WebRTC (data channels) for peer to peer transport. It can be used without browser plugins, extensions, or installations. It's Just JavaScript™. Note: WebTorrent does not support UDP/TCP peers in…
read the full webtorrent overview →
About qutebrowser
// SPDX License Identifier: GPL 3.0 or later // If you are reading this in plaintext or on PyPi: // // A rendered version is available at: // qutebrowser =========== // QUTE WEB HIDE image:qutebrowser/icons/qutebrowser 64x64.png[qutebrowser logo] A keyboard driven, vim like browser based on Python and Qt. image: Status", link=" image: badge",link=" link: link: link: // QUTE WEB HIDE END qutebrowser is a keyboard focused browser with a minimal GUI. It's based on Python and Qt and free software, licensed under the GPL. It was inspired by other browsers/addons like dwb and Vimperator/Pentadactyl. // QUTE WEB HIDE…
read the full qutebrowser overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is webtorrent or qutebrowser more popular?
webtorrent has 31,469 GitHub stars and qutebrowser has 11,737. webtorrent has the larger community by that measure.
Are webtorrent and qutebrowser free?
Both are open source. webtorrent is licensed under MIT and qutebrowser under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between webtorrent and qutebrowser?
webtorrent is written in JavaScript and qutebrowser in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, webtorrent or qutebrowser?
Choose webtorrent if you want the larger community (31,469 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose qutebrowser if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.