head to head · open source
mkdocs-material vs wandao
mkdocs-material has 27,596 GitHub stars, 4,154 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. wandao has 1,146 stars, 115 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 13 days ago. mkdocs-material leads on adoption by 2,308% (27,596 vs 1,146 stars). mkdocs-material is written in Python under MIT; wandao is written in Python under AGPL-3.0. mkdocs-material has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, wandao 10%. mkdocs-material was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| mkdocs-material | wandao | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 28K | ★ 1.1K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-30 | 2026-10-23 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.2K | ⑂ 115 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick mkdocs-material if
- You weight community size — 28K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick wandao if
- You want the wandao feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and wandao fits your workflow better
About mkdocs-material
A powerful documentation framework on top of MkDocs Write your documentation in Markdown and create a professional static site for your Open Source or commercial project in minutes – searchable, customizable, more than 60 languages, for all devices. Check out the demo – squidfunk.github.io/mkdocs material . Silver sponsors Bronze sponsors <img src=" height="58"
read the full mkdocs-material overview →
About wandao
万能导 Wandao ✨ 让知识没有壁垒，让多平台文档迁移更简单。 将你有权访问的知识库导出为本地 Markdown，或把本地 Markdown 导入其他平台。 尽量保留目录结构、正文格式、图片与附件，告别重复复制和手动整理。 📦 下载最新版 · 📖 使用教程 · 🧠 AI 辅助学习 · 🐛 反馈问题 · 🤝 参与共创 万能导是一个多平台知识库 Markdown 导入导出工具，目前支持飞书、语雀、阿里云 Thoughts、印象笔记、有道云笔记、为知笔记、OneNote、知识星球、ima 知识库、钉钉文档、WPS 文档、息流、Obsidian、Notion、知乎、CSDN、微信公众号和本地 Markdown 等内容来源与目标平台。 你可以把自己有权限访问的项目资料、团队知识库和课程文档导出为本地 Markdown，也可以把整理好的本地 Markdown 导入到支持的平台。万能导重点处理文档格式、图片、附件和目录层级，适合知识备份、平台迁移、学习资料整理，以及将“教学文档 + 源码项目”交给 AI 一起阅读。 如果有未能完整导出的内容或希望支持的新平台，欢迎提交 GitHub Issue。建议新平台不要求参与开发，平台使用经验、公开资料和测试意愿同样有价值；每一条可复现的反馈和共创需求都会被认真审查。 如果这个项目对你有帮助，欢迎在 GitHub 点一个 Star ⭐,这对我真的很重要 💗 特别赞助…
read the full wandao overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Documentation & Knowledge Base projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Documentation & Knowledge Base field.
Frequently asked questions
Is mkdocs-material or wandao more popular?
mkdocs-material has 27,596 GitHub stars and wandao has 1,146. mkdocs-material has the larger community by that measure.
Are mkdocs-material and wandao free?
Both are open source. mkdocs-material is licensed under MIT and wandao under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between mkdocs-material and wandao?
mkdocs-material is written in Python and wandao in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, mkdocs-material or wandao?
Choose mkdocs-material if you want the larger community (27,596 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose wandao if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.