head to head · open source
wagtail vs Instatic
wagtail has 20,599 GitHub stars, 4,676 forks, 1,007 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Instatic has 9,047 stars, 868 forks, 134 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. wagtail leads on adoption by 128% (20,599 vs 9,047 stars). wagtail is written in Python under BSD-3-Clause; Instatic is written in TypeScript under MIT. wagtail has attracted 23% as many forks as stars, Instatic 10%. wagtail was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (cms), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| wagtail | Instatic | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 21K | ★ 9.0K |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.7K | ⑂ 868 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick wagtail if
- You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Instatic if
- You want the Instatic feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Instatic fits your workflow better
About wagtail
Wagtail is an open source content management system built on Django, with a strong community and commercial support. It's focused on user experience, and offers precise control for designers and developers. 🔥 Features A fast, attractive interface for authors Complete control over front end design and structure Scales to millions of pages and thousands of editors Fast out of the box, cache friendly when you need it Content API for 'headless' sites with decoupled front end Runs on a Raspberry Pi or a multi datacenter cloud platform StreamField encourages flexible content without compromising structure Powerful…
read the full wagtail overview →
About Instatic
Instatic Own your site. Love building it. A self hosted CMS where the visual editor, content engine, and publisher all live in one Bun server — and the pages it ships are clean enough to read in view source. One Click Deploy · Quick Start · Docs · Plugins · Roadmap Watch the introductory video about Instatic on YouTube. A modern website usually means assembling a stack: a headless CMS, a framework, a host, a form service, an analytics vendor, an image CDN — each with its own bill, dashboard, and 2 a.m. outage. Instatic is the opposite bet. One Bun server holds the whole thing — the canvas editor, the content…
read the full Instatic overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is wagtail or Instatic more popular?
wagtail has 20,599 GitHub stars and Instatic has 9,047. wagtail has the larger community by that measure.
Are wagtail and Instatic free?
Both are open source. wagtail is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Instatic under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between wagtail and Instatic?
wagtail is written in Python and Instatic in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, wagtail or Instatic?
Choose wagtail if you want the larger community (20,599 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose Instatic if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.