head to head · open source

VvvebJs vs f-flow

VvvebJs has 8,678 GitHub stars, 1,836 forks, 304 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. f-flow has 530 stars, 63 forks, 10 open issues and last shipped 14 days ago. VvvebJs leads on adoption by 1,537% (8,678 vs 530 stars). VvvebJs is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0; f-flow is written in TypeScript under MIT. VvvebJs has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, f-flow 12%. f-flow was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (drag-and-drop, javascript), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

VvvebJs ★ 8.7K f-flow ★ 530 category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

VvvebJs f-flow
GitHub stars ★ 8.7K ★ 530
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-07-01 2026-09-06
Forks ⑂ 1.8K ⑂ 63
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick VvvebJs if

  • You weight community size — 8.7K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full VvvebJs profile →

pick f-flow if

  • You want the f-flow feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and f-flow fits your workflow better

full f-flow profile →

About VvvebJs

VvvebJs is a drag and drop page builder library written in vanilla JavaScript. It ships without dependencies and without a build step, so the editor runs directly in the browser from a plain HTML file rather than from a compiled bundle. The project lives in the JavaScript ecosystem and sits in the low code and no code tooling space: it is a library and editor surface rather than a finished product, and it is distributed under the Apache 2.0 license.

read the full VvvebJs overview →

About f-flow

Foblex Flow is an MIT licensed, TypeScript, Angular native node editor library for teams building production workflow builders, AI pipelines, and interactive diagram editors, and it is aimed at Angular developers who want drag, connection, selection, and zoom behaviour without adopting a separate state model.

read the full f-flow overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Automation projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.

VvvebJs vs n8n VvvebJs vs ProxmoxVE VvvebJs vs ActivePieces VvvebJs vs LiveKit VvvebJs vs amis VvvebJs vs Windmill VvvebJs vs Botpress VvvebJs vs mitosis VvvebJs vs Automatisch VvvebJs vs puck VvvebJs vs Typebot VvvebJs vs cadence

Frequently asked questions

Is VvvebJs or f-flow more popular?

VvvebJs has 8,678 GitHub stars and f-flow has 530. VvvebJs has the larger community by that measure.

Are VvvebJs and f-flow free?

Both are open source. VvvebJs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and f-flow under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between VvvebJs and f-flow?

VvvebJs is written in JavaScript and f-flow in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, VvvebJs or f-flow?

Choose VvvebJs if you want the larger community (8,678 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose f-flow if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.