head to head · open source

FluidVoice vs VoiceTypr

FluidVoice has 11,611 GitHub stars, 828 forks, 89 open issues and last shipped yesterday. VoiceTypr has 719 stars, 100 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. FluidVoice leads on adoption by 1,515% (11,611 vs 719 stars). FluidVoice is written in Swift under GPL-3.0; VoiceTypr is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0. FluidVoice has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, VoiceTypr 14%. FluidVoice was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

FluidVoice ★ 12K VoiceTypr ★ 719 category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

FluidVoice VoiceTypr
GitHub stars ★ 12K ★ 719
License GPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Swift Rust
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 828 ⑂ 100
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick FluidVoice if

  • You weight community size — 12K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full FluidVoice profile →

pick VoiceTypr if

  • You want the VoiceTypr feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and VoiceTypr fits your workflow better

full VoiceTypr profile →

About FluidVoice

FluidVoice is an open source voice dictation app for macOS under GPL 3.0. It uses on device speech recognition and a local AI enhancement layer to turn spoken input into text inside other applications. The project lives in the macOS and Swift ecosystem, with Homebrew installation, menu bar integration, and accessibility based text insertion.

read the full FluidVoice overview →

About VoiceTypr

VoiceTypr is an open source, offline first voice to text dictation application for macOS 14 or later and Windows 10 or 11. It is built with Tauri, Rust, and React, with a React interface on top of Rust pipelines that handle audio capture, transcription, global hotkeys, and text insertion. A global shortcut starts recording, the captured speech is transcribed locally by default, the result is optionally formatted, and the finished text is placed at the cursor of whichever application is already in focus. The project lives in the desktop input and dictation space rather than in the browser or the cloud, and it is d…

read the full VoiceTypr overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

handy vs fluidvoice handy vs voicetypr fluidvoice vs openwispr fluidvoice vs amical handy vs openwispr handy vs amical handy vs jarvis n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify n8n vs mole

More Input & Dictation projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Input & Dictation field.

FluidVoice vs Handy FluidVoice vs OpenWispr FluidVoice vs Amical FluidVoice vs Jarvis

Frequently asked questions

Is FluidVoice or VoiceTypr more popular?

FluidVoice has 11,611 GitHub stars and VoiceTypr has 719. FluidVoice has the larger community by that measure.

Are FluidVoice and VoiceTypr free?

Both are open source. FluidVoice is licensed under GPL-3.0 and VoiceTypr under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between FluidVoice and VoiceTypr?

FluidVoice is written in Swift and VoiceTypr in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, FluidVoice or VoiceTypr?

Choose FluidVoice if you want the larger community (11,611 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose VoiceTypr if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.