head to head · open source
vite vs Woodpecker CI
vite has 82,861 GitHub stars, 8,745 forks, 767 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Woodpecker CI has 7,886 stars, 679 forks, 371 open issues and last shipped yesterday. vite leads on adoption by 951% (82,861 vs 7,886 stars). vite is written in TypeScript under MIT; Woodpecker CI is written in Go under Apache-2.0. vite has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, Woodpecker CI 9%. vite was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| vite | Woodpecker CI | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 83K | ★ 7.9K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 679 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick vite if
- You weight community size — 83K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Woodpecker CI if
- You want the Woodpecker CI feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and Woodpecker CI fits your workflow better
About vite
Vite is a build tool for modern web projects, distributed as a set of npm packages and licensed under MIT. It is written in TypeScript and lives in the JavaScript and frontend tooling ecosystem, where it sits alongside the bundlers and dev servers that compile application source into browser ready assets. The project describes itself as next generation frontend tooling and has been maintained for roughly six years, with the most recent push recorded in September 2026.
About Woodpecker CI
Woodpecker CI is a continuous integration and continuous delivery engine written in Go and released under the Apache 2.0 license. It lives in the developer tooling ecosystem around build and deployment automation, and it is distributed as a self hostable server plus one or more agents that execute pipeline work. The project describes itself as a simple, yet powerful CI/CD engine with great extensibility, and it is catalogued under topics such as automation, ci, cicd, devops, docker, and kubernetes. Its documentation and plugin directory are hosted at woodpecker ci.org.
read the full Woodpecker CI overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Build & Deployment projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.
Frequently asked questions
Is vite or Woodpecker CI more popular?
vite has 82,861 GitHub stars and Woodpecker CI has 7,886. vite has the larger community by that measure.
Are vite and Woodpecker CI free?
Both are open source. vite is licensed under MIT and Woodpecker CI under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between vite and Woodpecker CI?
vite is written in TypeScript and Woodpecker CI in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, vite or Woodpecker CI?
Choose vite if you want the larger community (82,861 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Woodpecker CI if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.