head to head · open source
vite vs Woodpecker CI
vite has 83,676 GitHub stars, 9,089 forks, 767 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Woodpecker CI has 8,097 stars, 734 forks, 371 open issues and last shipped yesterday. vite leads on adoption by 933% (83,676 vs 8,097 stars). vite is written in TypeScript under MIT; Woodpecker CI is written in Go under Apache-2.0. vite has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, Woodpecker CI 9%. Woodpecker CI was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| vite | Woodpecker CI | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 84K | ★ 8.1K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 9.1K | ⑂ 734 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick vite if
- You weight community size — 84K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Woodpecker CI if
- You want the Woodpecker CI feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and Woodpecker CI fits your workflow better
About vite
Vite ⚡ Next Generation Frontend Tooling 💡 Instant Server Start ⚡️ Lightning Fast HMR 🛠️ Rich Features 📦 Optimized Build 🔩 Universal Plugin Interface 🔑 Fully Typed APIs Vite (French word for "quick", pronounced /viːt/ , like "veet") is a build tool that aims to provide a faster and leaner development experience for modern web projects. It consists of two major parts: A dev server that provides rich feature enhancements over native ES modules, for example extremely fast Hot Module Replacement (HMR). A build command that bundles your code with Rolldown, pre configured to output highly optimized static assets…
About Woodpecker CI
Woodpecker Woodpecker is a simple, yet powerful CI/CD engine with great extensibility. Installation & Resources Woodpecker can be installed in various ways (see the Installation Instructions) and runs with SQLite as database by default. It requires around 100 MB of RAM (Server) and 30 MB (Agent) at runtime in idle mode. Support You can support the project by becoming a backer on Open Collective or via GitHub Sponsors. Documentation Our documentation can be found at . Translation We have a self hosted Weblate instance at translate.woodpecker ci.org. An overview of the current translation state is available at…
read the full Woodpecker CI overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Build & Deployment projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.
Frequently asked questions
Is vite or Woodpecker CI more popular?
vite has 83,676 GitHub stars and Woodpecker CI has 8,097. vite has the larger community by that measure.
Are vite and Woodpecker CI free?
Both are open source. vite is licensed under MIT and Woodpecker CI under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between vite and Woodpecker CI?
vite is written in TypeScript and Woodpecker CI in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, vite or Woodpecker CI?
Choose vite if you want the larger community (83,676 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Woodpecker CI if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.