head to head · open source

vite vs rspack

vite has 82,861 GitHub stars, 8,745 forks, 767 open issues and last shipped yesterday. rspack has 12,906 stars, 854 forks, 224 open issues and last shipped yesterday. vite leads on adoption by 542% (82,861 vs 12,906 stars). vite is written in TypeScript under MIT; rspack is written in Rust under MIT. vite has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, rspack 7%. rspack was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (build-tool), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

vite ★ 83K rspack ★ 13K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

vite rspack
GitHub stars ★ 83K ★ 13K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript Rust
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 8.7K ⑂ 854
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick vite if

  • You weight community size — 83K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full vite profile →

pick rspack if

  • You want the rspack feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and rspack fits your workflow better

full rspack profile →

About vite

Vite is a build tool for modern web projects, distributed as a set of npm packages and licensed under MIT. It is written in TypeScript and lives in the JavaScript and frontend tooling ecosystem, where it sits alongside the bundlers and dev servers that compile application source into browser ready assets. The project describes itself as next generation frontend tooling and has been maintained for roughly six years, with the most recent push recorded in September 2026.

read the full vite overview →

About rspack

Rspack is a fast bundler for the web written in Rust, distributed under the MIT license. It modernizes the webpack API so that webpack configurations can be replaced seamlessly, while the Rust core delivers fast build speeds. The project lives in the JavaScript and TypeScript build tooling ecosystem, and it is part of Rstack, a unified JavaScript toolchain that also includes Rsbuild, Rslib, Rspress, Rsdoctor, Rstest, and Rslint. The repository carries the topics build tool, bundler, compiler, esm, javascript, jsx, loaders, module bundler, rspack, rstack, rust, and typescript.

read the full rspack overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel vite vs harness vite vs dokku vite vs turborepo vite vs nx webpack vs appwrite opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

vite vs webpack vite vs Appwrite vite vs parcel vite vs Harness vite vs Dokku vite vs turborepo vite vs nx vite vs NocoBase vite vs gradle vite vs devbox vite vs xmake vite vs chalice

Frequently asked questions

Is vite or rspack more popular?

vite has 82,861 GitHub stars and rspack has 12,906. vite has the larger community by that measure.

Are vite and rspack free?

Both are open source. vite is licensed under MIT and rspack under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between vite and rspack?

vite is written in TypeScript and rspack in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, vite or rspack?

Choose vite if you want the larger community (82,861 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose rspack if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.