head to head · open source

uBlock vs terminal-browser

uBlock has 67,937 GitHub stars, 4,354 forks, 15 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. terminal-browser has 3,081 stars, 145 forks, 64 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. uBlock leads on adoption by 2,105% (67,937 vs 3,081 stars). uBlock is written in JavaScript under GPL-3.0; terminal-browser is written in TypeScript under MIT. uBlock has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, terminal-browser 5%. uBlock was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

uBlock ★ 68K terminal-browser ★ 3.1K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

uBlock terminal-browser
GitHub stars ★ 68K ★ 3.1K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 4.4K ⑂ 145
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick uBlock if

  • You weight community size — 68K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full uBlock profile →

pick terminal-browser if

  • You want the terminal-browser feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and terminal-browser fits your workflow better

full terminal-browser profile →

About uBlock

uBlock Origin is a CPU and memory efficient, wide spectrum content blocker for Chromium and Firefox, aimed at anyone who wants ads, trackers, coin miners, popups, anti blockers and malware sites neutralised by default without hand tuning anything.

read the full uBlock overview →

About terminal-browser

terminal browser is a real Chromium based browser that renders inside a terminal emulator, written in TypeScript under the MIT licence, for developers who live in the terminal and for coding agents that need to see and operate the web.

read the full terminal-browser overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

ublock vs ladybird ublock vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs monaco-editor ublock vs zen-browser browser-use vs chrome-devtools-mcp ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp ladybird vs monaco-editor ladybird vs zen-browser openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

uBlock vs Ladybird uBlock vs chrome-devtools-mcp uBlock vs monaco-editor uBlock vs Zen Browser uBlock vs servo uBlock vs serenity uBlock vs refined-github uBlock vs slate uBlock vs Avalonia uBlock vs webtorrent uBlock vs fingerprintjs uBlock vs obscura

Frequently asked questions

Is uBlock or terminal-browser more popular?

uBlock has 67,937 GitHub stars and terminal-browser has 3,081. uBlock has the larger community by that measure.

Are uBlock and terminal-browser free?

Both are open source. uBlock is licensed under GPL-3.0 and terminal-browser under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between uBlock and terminal-browser?

uBlock is written in JavaScript and terminal-browser in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, uBlock or terminal-browser?

Choose uBlock if you want the larger community (67,937 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose terminal-browser if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.