head to head · open source

uBlock vs happy-dom

uBlock has 67,937 GitHub stars, 4,354 forks, 15 open issues and last shipped yesterday. happy-dom has 4,654 stars, 323 forks, 444 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. uBlock leads on adoption by 1,360% (67,937 vs 4,654 stars). uBlock is written in JavaScript under GPL-3.0; happy-dom is written in TypeScript under MIT. uBlock has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, happy-dom 7%. uBlock was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (javascript), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

uBlock ★ 68K happy-dom ★ 4.7K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

uBlock happy-dom
GitHub stars ★ 68K ★ 4.7K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-12
Forks ⑂ 4.4K ⑂ 323
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick uBlock if

  • You weight community size — 68K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full uBlock profile →

pick happy-dom if

  • You want the happy-dom feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and happy-dom fits your workflow better

full happy-dom profile →

About uBlock

uBlock Origin is a CPU and memory efficient, wide spectrum content blocker for Chromium and Firefox, aimed at anyone who wants ads, trackers, coin miners, popups, anti blockers and malware sites neutralised by default without hand tuning anything.

read the full uBlock overview →

About happy-dom

happy dom is a JavaScript implementation of a web browser without its graphical user interface, written in TypeScript, MIT licensed, and built for developers who need a browser like DOM inside Node.js or Bun instead of inside an actual browser window.

read the full happy-dom overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

ublock vs ladybird ublock vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs monaco-editor ublock vs zen-browser ublock vs servo ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp ladybird vs monaco-editor ladybird vs zen-browser n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

uBlock vs Ladybird uBlock vs chrome-devtools-mcp uBlock vs monaco-editor uBlock vs Zen Browser uBlock vs servo uBlock vs serenity uBlock vs refined-github uBlock vs slate uBlock vs Avalonia uBlock vs webtorrent uBlock vs fingerprintjs uBlock vs obscura

Frequently asked questions

Is uBlock or happy-dom more popular?

uBlock has 67,937 GitHub stars and happy-dom has 4,654. uBlock has the larger community by that measure.

Are uBlock and happy-dom free?

Both are open source. uBlock is licensed under GPL-3.0 and happy-dom under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between uBlock and happy-dom?

uBlock is written in JavaScript and happy-dom in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, uBlock or happy-dom?

Choose uBlock if you want the larger community (67,937 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose happy-dom if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.