head to head · open source

Typebot vs loopx

Typebot has 10,341 GitHub stars, 3,207 forks, 22 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. loopx has 5,903 stars, 559 forks, 102 open issues and last shipped today. Typebot leads on adoption by 75% (10,341 vs 5,903 stars). Typebot is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; loopx is written in Python under Apache-2.0. Typebot has attracted 31% as many forks as stars, loopx 9%. loopx was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Typebot ★ 10K loopx ★ 5.9K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Typebot loopx
GitHub stars ★ 10K ★ 5.9K
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 3.2K ⑂ 559
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Typebot if

  • You weight community size — 10K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Typebot profile →

pick loopx if

  • You want the loopx feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and loopx fits your workflow better

full loopx profile →

About Typebot

Typebot is Fair Source chatbot builder. Users create advanced chatbots visually. Chatbots embed in web and mobile apps. Results collect in real time. Project lives in self hosted chatbot, conversational bot, form builder ecosystem. Stack uses TypeScript, Next.js, TailwindCSS. GitHub topics include chat application, chatbot, conversational bots, form builder, nextjs, tailwindcss.

read the full Typebot overview →

About loopx

LoopX is an open, provider neutral, local first control plane for long horizon AI agents that preserves objectives, gates, todos, evidence, quota, and handoffs across turns for developers and teams running durable, governed work on harnesses such as Codex, Claude Code, and Cursor.

read the full loopx overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Automation projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.

Typebot vs n8n Typebot vs ProxmoxVE Typebot vs ActivePieces Typebot vs LiveKit Typebot vs amis Typebot vs Windmill Typebot vs Botpress Typebot vs mitosis Typebot vs Automatisch Typebot vs puck Typebot vs cadence Typebot vs local-deep-research

Frequently asked questions

Is Typebot or loopx more popular?

Typebot has 10,341 GitHub stars and loopx has 5,903. Typebot has the larger community by that measure.

Are Typebot and loopx free?

Both are open source. Typebot has no licence declared in this registry, and loopx is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Typebot and loopx?

Typebot is written in TypeScript and loopx in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Typebot or loopx?

Choose Typebot if you want the larger community (10,341 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose loopx if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.