head to head · open source

Tuta vs Phase

Tuta has 7,925 GitHub stars, 639 forks, 1,001 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Phase has 923 stars, 70 forks, 78 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Tuta leads on adoption by 759% (7,925 vs 923 stars). Tuta is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0; Phase is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence. Tuta has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Phase 8%. Tuta was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Tuta ★ 7.9K Phase ★ 923 category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Tuta Phase
GitHub stars ★ 7.9K ★ 923
License GPL-3.0 Custom / other
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 639 ⑂ 70
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Tuta if

  • You weight community size — 7.9K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Tuta profile →

pick Phase if

  • You want the Phase feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Phase fits your workflow better

full Phase profile →

About Tuta

Tuta is an open source, end to end encrypted email, calendar and contacts service for individuals and teams who need private communication to work across every device they own.

read the full Tuta overview →

About Phase

Phase is an open source secrets management platform, written in TypeScript, that lets fast moving engineering teams secure, deploy, and manage application secrets and environment variables from development through to production.

read the full Phase overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia

More Data Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Security & Privacy field.

Tuta vs Puter Tuta vs Mattermost Tuta vs Signal Tuta vs Ente Tuta vs Element Tuta vs Fluxer Tuta vs certificates Tuta vs Zen Tuta vs Cinny Tuta vs Certipy Tuta vs Stoat Tuta vs Quiet

Frequently asked questions

Is Tuta or Phase more popular?

Tuta has 7,925 GitHub stars and Phase has 923. Tuta has the larger community by that measure.

Are Tuta and Phase free?

Both are open source. Tuta is licensed under GPL-3.0, and Phase has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Tuta and Phase?

Tuta is written in TypeScript and Phase in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Tuta or Phase?

Choose Tuta if you want the larger community (7,925 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Phase if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.