head to head · open source

Tuta vs certstrap

Tuta has 7,925 GitHub stars, 639 forks, 1,001 open issues and last shipped yesterday. certstrap has 2,454 stars, 212 forks, 32 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. Tuta leads on adoption by 223% (7,925 vs 2,454 stars). Tuta is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0; certstrap is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Tuta has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, certstrap 9%. Tuta was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Tuta ★ 7.9K certstrap ★ 2.5K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Tuta certstrap
GitHub stars ★ 7.9K ★ 2.5K
License GPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-02-03
Forks ⑂ 639 ⑂ 212
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Tuta if

  • You weight community size — 7.9K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Tuta profile →

pick certstrap if

  • You want the certstrap feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and certstrap fits your workflow better

full certstrap profile →

About Tuta

Tuta is an open source, end to end encrypted email, calendar and contacts service for individuals and teams who need private communication to work across every device they own.

read the full Tuta overview →

About certstrap

certstrap is a simple certificate manager written in Go that bootstraps a private certificate authority and public key infrastructure, aimed at operators and developers who need to issue TLS certificates without wrestling with openssl.

read the full certstrap overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault

More Data Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Security & Privacy field.

Tuta vs Puter Tuta vs Mattermost Tuta vs Signal Tuta vs Ente Tuta vs Element Tuta vs Fluxer Tuta vs certificates Tuta vs Zen Tuta vs Cinny Tuta vs Certipy Tuta vs Stoat Tuta vs Quiet

Frequently asked questions

Is Tuta or certstrap more popular?

Tuta has 7,925 GitHub stars and certstrap has 2,454. Tuta has the larger community by that measure.

Are Tuta and certstrap free?

Both are open source. Tuta is licensed under GPL-3.0 and certstrap under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Tuta and certstrap?

Tuta is written in TypeScript and certstrap in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Tuta or certstrap?

Choose Tuta if you want the larger community (7,925 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose certstrap if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.