head to head · open source

Tuta vs AutomatedLab

Tuta has 7,925 GitHub stars, 639 forks, 1,001 open issues and last shipped yesterday. AutomatedLab has 2,226 stars, 383 forks, 31 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. Tuta leads on adoption by 256% (7,925 vs 2,226 stars). Tuta is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0; AutomatedLab is written in PowerShell under MIT. Tuta has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, AutomatedLab 17%. Tuta was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Tuta ★ 7.9K AutomatedLab ★ 2.2K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Tuta AutomatedLab
GitHub stars ★ 7.9K ★ 2.2K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript PowerShell
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-07-06
Forks ⑂ 639 ⑂ 383
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Tuta if

  • You weight community size — 7.9K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Tuta profile →

pick AutomatedLab if

  • You want the AutomatedLab feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches PowerShell
  • You evaluated both and AutomatedLab fits your workflow better

full AutomatedLab profile →

About Tuta

Tuta is an open source, end to end encrypted email, calendar and contacts service for individuals and teams who need private communication to work across every device they own.

read the full Tuta overview →

About AutomatedLab

AutomatedLab is an MIT licensed PowerShell provisioning framework that deploys complex lab environments — Windows domain controllers, Exchange, PKI, IIS and Linux guests — on Hyper V or Azure from simple scripts, built for IT admins, testers and trainers who need full multi VM labs on demand.

read the full AutomatedLab overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault

More Data Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Security & Privacy field.

Tuta vs Puter Tuta vs Mattermost Tuta vs Signal Tuta vs Ente Tuta vs Element Tuta vs Fluxer Tuta vs certificates Tuta vs Zen Tuta vs Cinny Tuta vs Certipy Tuta vs Stoat Tuta vs Quiet

Frequently asked questions

Is Tuta or AutomatedLab more popular?

Tuta has 7,925 GitHub stars and AutomatedLab has 2,226. Tuta has the larger community by that measure.

Are Tuta and AutomatedLab free?

Both are open source. Tuta is licensed under GPL-3.0 and AutomatedLab under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Tuta and AutomatedLab?

Tuta is written in TypeScript and AutomatedLab in PowerShell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Tuta or AutomatedLab?

Choose Tuta if you want the larger community (7,925 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose AutomatedLab if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.