head to head · open source

turborepo vs bun

turborepo has 31,118 GitHub stars, 2,445 forks, 13 open issues and last shipped today. bun has 4,974 stars, 306 forks, 38 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. turborepo leads on adoption by 526% (31,118 vs 4,974 stars). turborepo is written in Rust under MIT; bun is written in Go under BSD-2-Clause. turborepo has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, bun 6%. turborepo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

turborepo ★ 31K bun ★ 5.0K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

turborepo bun
GitHub stars ★ 31K ★ 5.0K
License MIT BSD-2-Clause
Written in Rust Go
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-08-21
Forks ⑂ 2.4K ⑂ 306
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick turborepo if

  • You weight community size — 31K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full turborepo profile →

pick bun if

  • You want the bun feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and bun fits your workflow better

full bun profile →

About turborepo

Turborepo is a build system for JavaScript and TypeScript monorepos, written in Rust and released under the MIT licence, intended for teams that build many packages inside one repository and for the coding agents those teams run against it.

read the full turborepo overview →

About bun

Bun is a lightweight, SQL first object relational mapper for Go that gives backend engineers type safe access to PostgreSQL, MySQL/MariaDB, MSSQL, SQLite, and Oracle from one database agnostic codebase.

read the full bun overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs harness react vs vite supabase vs appwrite kubernetes vs dokku vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel webpack vs appwrite openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

turborepo vs vite turborepo vs webpack turborepo vs Appwrite turborepo vs parcel turborepo vs esbuild turborepo vs Harness turborepo vs Dokku turborepo vs nx turborepo vs NocoBase turborepo vs gradle turborepo vs rspack turborepo vs devbox

Frequently asked questions

Is turborepo or bun more popular?

turborepo has 31,118 GitHub stars and bun has 4,974. turborepo has the larger community by that measure.

Are turborepo and bun free?

Both are open source. turborepo is licensed under MIT and bun under BSD-2-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between turborepo and bun?

turborepo is written in Rust and bun in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, turborepo or bun?

Choose turborepo if you want the larger community (31,118 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose bun if its feature set, stack or BSD-2-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.