head to head · open source

turborepo vs devbox

turborepo has 31,102 GitHub stars, 2,444 forks, 13 open issues and last shipped yesterday. devbox has 12,362 stars, 357 forks, 466 open issues and last shipped yesterday. turborepo leads on adoption by 152% (31,102 vs 12,362 stars). turborepo is written in Rust under MIT; devbox is written in Go under Apache-2.0. turborepo has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, devbox 3%. turborepo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (build-system, build-tool), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

turborepo ★ 31K devbox ★ 12K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

turborepo devbox
GitHub stars ★ 31K ★ 12K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Rust Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.4K ⑂ 357
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick turborepo if

  • You weight community size — 31K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full turborepo profile →

pick devbox if

  • You want the devbox feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and devbox fits your workflow better

full devbox profile →

About turborepo

Turborepo is a build system for JavaScript and TypeScript monorepos, written in Rust and released under the MIT licence, intended for teams that build many packages inside one repository and for the coding agents those teams run against it.

read the full turborepo overview →

About devbox

Devbox is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed command line tool written in Go that creates isolated, reproducible development shells from a single declaration file, and it is aimed at individual developers and teams who need identical toolchain versions on every machine and in every environment.

read the full devbox overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

vite vs turborepo vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel webpack vs appwrite vite vs harness vite vs dokku vite vs nx opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

turborepo vs vite turborepo vs webpack turborepo vs Appwrite turborepo vs parcel turborepo vs Harness turborepo vs Dokku turborepo vs nx turborepo vs NocoBase turborepo vs gradle turborepo vs rspack turborepo vs xmake turborepo vs chalice

Frequently asked questions

Is turborepo or devbox more popular?

turborepo has 31,102 GitHub stars and devbox has 12,362. turborepo has the larger community by that measure.

Are turborepo and devbox free?

Both are open source. turborepo is licensed under MIT and devbox under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between turborepo and devbox?

turborepo is written in Rust and devbox in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, turborepo or devbox?

Choose turborepo if you want the larger community (31,102 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose devbox if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.