head to head · open source
turborepo vs rspack
turborepo has 31,102 GitHub stars, 2,444 forks, 13 open issues and last shipped yesterday. rspack has 12,906 stars, 854 forks, 224 open issues and last shipped yesterday. turborepo leads on adoption by 141% (31,102 vs 12,906 stars). turborepo is written in Rust under MIT; rspack is written in Rust under MIT. turborepo has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, rspack 7%. turborepo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (build-tool, javascript, typescript), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| turborepo | rspack | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 31K | ★ 13K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Rust | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.4K | ⑂ 854 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick turborepo if
- You weight community size — 31K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick rspack if
- You want the rspack feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and rspack fits your workflow better
About turborepo
Turborepo is a build system for JavaScript and TypeScript monorepos, written in Rust and released under the MIT licence, intended for teams that build many packages inside one repository and for the coding agents those teams run against it.
read the full turborepo overview →
About rspack
Rspack is a fast bundler for the web written in Rust, distributed under the MIT license. It modernizes the webpack API so that webpack configurations can be replaced seamlessly, while the Rust core delivers fast build speeds. The project lives in the JavaScript and TypeScript build tooling ecosystem, and it is part of Rstack, a unified JavaScript toolchain that also includes Rsbuild, Rslib, Rspress, Rsdoctor, Rstest, and Rslint. The repository carries the topics build tool, bundler, compiler, esm, javascript, jsx, loaders, module bundler, rspack, rstack, rust, and typescript.
read the full rspack overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Build & Deployment projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.
Frequently asked questions
Is turborepo or rspack more popular?
turborepo has 31,102 GitHub stars and rspack has 12,906. turborepo has the larger community by that measure.
Are turborepo and rspack free?
Both are open source. turborepo is licensed under MIT and rspack under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between turborepo and rspack?
turborepo is written in Rust and rspack in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, turborepo or rspack?
Choose turborepo if you want the larger community (31,102 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose rspack if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.