head to head · open source

Tone.js vs Chobble Tickets

Tone.js has 14,725 GitHub stars, 1,063 forks, 65 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Chobble Tickets has 32 stars, 3 forks, 104 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Tone.js leads on adoption by 45,916% (14,725 vs 32 stars). Tone.js is written in TypeScript under MIT; Chobble Tickets is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Tone.js has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Chobble Tickets 9%. Chobble Tickets was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Tone.js ★ 15K Chobble Tickets ★ 32 category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Tone.js Chobble Tickets
GitHub stars ★ 15K ★ 32
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 1.1K ⑂ 3
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Tone.js if

  • You weight community size — 15K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Tone.js profile →

pick Chobble Tickets if

  • You want the Chobble Tickets feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Chobble Tickets fits your workflow better

full Chobble Tickets profile →

About Tone.js

Tone.js is a Web Audio framework for creating interactive music in the browser. It is written in TypeScript and released under the MIT license, and it lives in the JavaScript and Web Audio API ecosystem, where it is distributed through npm and unpkg. The project has been developed for roughly thirteen years and carries a substantial community footprint, with more than fourteen thousand stars and over a thousand forks on GitHub.

read the full Tone.js overview →

About Chobble Tickets

Chobble Tickets is an AGPL 3.0 only event ticketing and reservation system for event organisers who want private sales without per ticket platform fees, built by Chobble CIC and deployable on Bunny Edge Scripting or any Deno environment with libsql.

read the full Chobble Tickets overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

cal-com vs tone-js cal-com vs luigi cal-com vs salt cal-com vs apscheduler cal-com vs rallly cal-com vs easy-appointments cal-com vs hi-events cal-com vs croner plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor

More Scheduling & Event Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Scheduling & Event Management field.

Tone.js vs Cal.com Tone.js vs luigi Tone.js vs salt Tone.js vs apscheduler Tone.js vs Rallly Tone.js vs Easy!Appointments Tone.js vs Hi.Events Tone.js vs croner Tone.js vs brightbean-studio Tone.js vs Saturn Tone.js vs nexrender Tone.js vs laravel-totem

Frequently asked questions

Is Tone.js or Chobble Tickets more popular?

Tone.js has 14,725 GitHub stars and Chobble Tickets has 32. Tone.js has the larger community by that measure.

Are Tone.js and Chobble Tickets free?

Both are open source. Tone.js is licensed under MIT and Chobble Tickets under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Tone.js and Chobble Tickets?

Tone.js is written in TypeScript and Chobble Tickets in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Tone.js or Chobble Tickets?

Choose Tone.js if you want the larger community (14,725 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Chobble Tickets if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.