head to head · open source
teleport vs SnapOtter
teleport has 20,924 GitHub stars, 2,158 forks, 3,262 open issues and last shipped yesterday. SnapOtter has 2,685 stars, 136 forks, 208 open issues and last shipped yesterday. teleport leads on adoption by 679% (20,924 vs 2,685 stars). teleport is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; SnapOtter is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. teleport has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, SnapOtter 5%. SnapOtter was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| teleport | SnapOtter | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 21K | ★ 2.7K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Go | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.2K | ⑂ 136 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick teleport if
- You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick SnapOtter if
- You want the SnapOtter feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and SnapOtter fits your workflow better
About teleport
Teleport is an open source, identity aware access plane that provides connectivity, authentication, access control, and audit for servers, Kubernetes clusters, databases, Windows desktops, web applications, and cloud APIs, and it is aimed at platform, security, and infrastructure teams that need to protect access to that infrastructure.
read the full teleport overview →
About SnapOtter
SnapOtter is an open source, self hosted file processing tool in TypeScript under AGPL 3.0. It provides a UI, REST API, and pipelines for conversion, compression, editing, OCR, transcription, metadata stripping, and local AI across images, video, audio, PDFs, and documents. It lives in the Docker based self hosted software ecosystem, where teams process media and documents on owned hardware instead of external services.
read the full SnapOtter overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Compliance & Risk Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Compliance & Risk Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is teleport or SnapOtter more popular?
teleport has 20,924 GitHub stars and SnapOtter has 2,685. teleport has the larger community by that measure.
Are teleport and SnapOtter free?
Both are open source. teleport is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and SnapOtter under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between teleport and SnapOtter?
teleport is written in Go and SnapOtter in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, teleport or SnapOtter?
Choose teleport if you want the larger community (20,924 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose SnapOtter if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.