head to head · open source
teleport vs SnapOtter
teleport has 21,061 GitHub stars, 2,181 forks, 3,262 open issues and last shipped 14 days ago. SnapOtter has 2,929 stars, 174 forks, 208 open issues and last shipped yesterday. teleport leads on adoption by 619% (21,061 vs 2,929 stars). teleport is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; SnapOtter is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. teleport has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, SnapOtter 6%. SnapOtter was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| teleport | SnapOtter | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 21K | ★ 2.9K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Go | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-20 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.2K | ⑂ 174 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick teleport if
- You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick SnapOtter if
- You want the SnapOtter feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and SnapOtter fits your workflow better
About teleport
Teleport provides connectivity, authentication, access controls and audit for infrastructure. You might use Teleport to: Set up single sign on (SSO) for all of your cloud and on prem infrastructure. Protect access to servers, Kubernetes clusters, databases, Windows desktops, web applications, and cloud APIs without long lived keys or passwords. Establish secure tunnels to reach resources behind NATs and firewalls without VPNs or bastion hosts. Record and audit activity across SSH, Kubernetes, database, RDP, and web sessions. Apply consistent Role Based and Attribute Based Access Control (RBAC/ABAC) across users…
read the full teleport overview →
About SnapOtter
Open source, self hosted file processing infrastructure. Convert, compress, OCR, transcribe, strip metadata, and run local AI across image, video, audio, PDF, and documents, through a UI, REST API, and pipelines. Your files never leave your network. The one self hosted stack that replaces CloudConvert, Smallpdf, TinyPNG, TinyWow, and Otter.ai. 200+ tools across five modalities, on hardware you own. Stirling PDF stops at PDFs. ConvertX stops at conversions. SnapOtter runs all five, and your files never leave your server. Edit images, convert video, transcribe audio, repair PDFs, batch your files: one Docker…
read the full SnapOtter overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Compliance & Risk Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Compliance & Risk Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is teleport or SnapOtter more popular?
teleport has 21,061 GitHub stars and SnapOtter has 2,929. teleport has the larger community by that measure.
Are teleport and SnapOtter free?
Both are open source. teleport is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and SnapOtter under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between teleport and SnapOtter?
teleport is written in Go and SnapOtter in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, teleport or SnapOtter?
Choose teleport if you want the larger community (21,061 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose SnapOtter if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.