head to head · open source
teleport vs ort
teleport has 21,061 GitHub stars, 2,181 forks, 3,262 open issues and last shipped 14 days ago. ort has 2,117 stars, 393 forks, 324 open issues and last shipped yesterday. teleport leads on adoption by 895% (21,061 vs 2,117 stars). teleport is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; ort is written in Kotlin under Apache-2.0. teleport has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, ort 19%. ort was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| teleport | ort | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 21K | ★ 2.1K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Go | Kotlin |
| Last push | 2026-10-20 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.2K | ⑂ 393 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick teleport if
- You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick ort if
- You want the ort feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Kotlin
- You evaluated both and ort fits your workflow better
About teleport
Teleport provides connectivity, authentication, access controls and audit for infrastructure. You might use Teleport to: Set up single sign on (SSO) for all of your cloud and on prem infrastructure. Protect access to servers, Kubernetes clusters, databases, Windows desktops, web applications, and cloud APIs without long lived keys or passwords. Establish secure tunnels to reach resources behind NATs and firewalls without VPNs or bastion hosts. Record and audit activity across SSH, Kubernetes, database, RDP, and web sessions. Apply consistent Role Based and Attribute Based Access Control (RBAC/ABAC) across users…
read the full teleport overview →
About ort
[![Slack][1]][2] [![Static Analysis][3]][4] [![Build and Test][5]][6] [![Code coverage][7]][8] [![REUSE status][9]][10] [![OpenSSF Best Practices][11]][12] [![OpenSSF Scorecard][13]][14] [1]: [2]: [3]: [4]: [5]: [6]: [7]: [8]: [9]: [10]: [11]: [12]: [13]: [14]: Introduction The OSS Review Toolkit (ORT) is a FOSS policy automation and orchestration toolkit that you can use to manage your (open source) software dependencies in a strategic, safe and efficient manner. You can use it to: Generate CycloneDX, SPDX SBOMs, or custom FOSS attribution documentation for your software project Automate your FOSS policy using…
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Compliance & Risk Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Compliance & Risk Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is teleport or ort more popular?
teleport has 21,061 GitHub stars and ort has 2,117. teleport has the larger community by that measure.
Are teleport and ort free?
Both are open source. teleport is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and ort under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between teleport and ort?
teleport is written in Go and ort in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, teleport or ort?
Choose teleport if you want the larger community (21,061 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose ort if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.