head to head · open source
teleport vs FinanceToolkit
teleport has 21,061 GitHub stars, 2,181 forks, 3,262 open issues and last shipped 14 days ago. FinanceToolkit has 5,488 stars, 641 forks, 10 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. teleport leads on adoption by 284% (21,061 vs 5,488 stars). teleport is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; FinanceToolkit is written in Python under MIT. teleport has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, FinanceToolkit 12%. FinanceToolkit was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| teleport | FinanceToolkit | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 21K | ★ 5.5K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-20 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.2K | ⑂ 641 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick teleport if
- You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick FinanceToolkit if
- You want the FinanceToolkit feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and FinanceToolkit fits your workflow better
About teleport
Teleport provides connectivity, authentication, access controls and audit for infrastructure. You might use Teleport to: Set up single sign on (SSO) for all of your cloud and on prem infrastructure. Protect access to servers, Kubernetes clusters, databases, Windows desktops, web applications, and cloud APIs without long lived keys or passwords. Establish secure tunnels to reach resources behind NATs and firewalls without VPNs or bastion hosts. Record and audit activity across SSH, Kubernetes, database, RDP, and web sessions. Apply consistent Role Based and Attribute Based Access Control (RBAC/ABAC) across users…
read the full teleport overview →
About FinanceToolkit
While browsing a variety of websites, I repeatedly observed significant fluctuations in the same financial metric among different sources. Similarly, the reported financial statements often didn't line up, and there was limited information on the methodology used to calculate each metric. For example, Microsoft's Price to Earnings (PE) ratio on the 6th of May, 2023 is reported to be 28.93 (Stockopedia), 32.05 (Morningstar), 32.66 (Macrotrends), 33.09 (Finance Charts), 33.66 (Y Charts), 33.67 (Wall Street Journal), 33.80 (Yahoo Finance) and 34.4 (Companies Market Cap). All of these calculations are correct…
read the full FinanceToolkit overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Compliance & Risk Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Compliance & Risk Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is teleport or FinanceToolkit more popular?
teleport has 21,061 GitHub stars and FinanceToolkit has 5,488. teleport has the larger community by that measure.
Are teleport and FinanceToolkit free?
Both are open source. teleport is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and FinanceToolkit under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between teleport and FinanceToolkit?
teleport is written in Go and FinanceToolkit in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, teleport or FinanceToolkit?
Choose teleport if you want the larger community (21,061 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose FinanceToolkit if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.