head to head · open source

syncthing vs zipline

syncthing has 90,205 GitHub stars, 5,581 forks, 388 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. zipline has 3,489 stars, 262 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped yesterday. syncthing leads on adoption by 2,485% (90,205 vs 3,489 stars). syncthing is written in Go under MPL-2.0; zipline is written in TypeScript under MIT. syncthing has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, zipline 8%. zipline was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

syncthing ★ 90K zipline ★ 3.5K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

syncthing zipline
GitHub stars ★ 90K ★ 3.5K
License MPL-2.0 MIT
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-11-05 2026-11-08
Forks ⑂ 5.6K ⑂ 262
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick syncthing if

  • You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
  • You want the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full syncthing profile →

pick zipline if

  • You want the zipline feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and zipline fits your workflow better

full zipline profile →

About syncthing

[![Syncthing][14]][15] Goals Syncthing is a continuous file synchronization program . It synchronizes files between two or more computers. We strive to fulfill the goals below. The goals are listed in order of importance, the most important ones first. This is the summary version of the goal list for more commentary, see the full [Goals document][13]. Syncthing should be: 1. Safe From Data Loss Protecting the user's data is paramount. We take every reasonable precaution to avoid corrupting the user's files. 2. Secure Against Attackers Again, protecting the user's data is paramount. Regardless of our other goals…

read the full syncthing overview →

About zipline

The next generation ShareX / File upload server Documentation: zipline.diced.sh Features Setup Quickly: Get Started with Docker Configure Upload any file Folders Tags URL shortening Embeds Discord Webhooks HTTP Webhooks OAuth2 2FA Passkeys Password Protection Image Compression Video Thumbnails API PWA Partial Uploads Invites Quotas Custom Themes ... and more! Usage Visit the docs for a more in depth guide on how to get started. Install and Run with Docker This is the recommended way to run Zipline: [!WARNING] Zipline requires a cpu with AVX support. We don't provide binaries or images that have support for non…

read the full zipline overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

Related comparisons

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

Frequently asked questions

Is syncthing or zipline more popular?

syncthing has 90,205 GitHub stars and zipline has 3,489. syncthing has the larger community by that measure.

Are syncthing and zipline free?

Both are open source. syncthing is licensed under MPL-2.0 and zipline under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between syncthing and zipline?

syncthing is written in Go and zipline in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, syncthing or zipline?

Choose syncthing if you want the larger community (90,205 stars) or its MPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose zipline if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.