head to head · open source

Fathom Lite vs Swetrix

Fathom Lite has 8,020 GitHub stars, 383 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. Swetrix has 1,201 stars, 74 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Fathom Lite leads on adoption by 568% (8,020 vs 1,201 stars). Fathom Lite is written in Go under MIT; Swetrix is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Fathom Lite has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Swetrix 6%. Swetrix was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (google-analytics, metrics, privacy), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Fathom Lite ★ 8.0K Swetrix ★ 1.2K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Fathom Lite Swetrix
GitHub stars ★ 8.0K ★ 1.2K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-03-18 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 383 ⑂ 74
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Fathom Lite if

  • You weight community size — 8.0K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Fathom Lite profile →

pick Swetrix if

  • You want the Swetrix feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Swetrix fits your workflow better

full Swetrix profile →

About Fathom Lite

Fathom Lite is the original open source, self hosted edition of Fathom Analytics — a simple, privacy focused website analytics tool written in Go with a Preact dashboard, released under the MIT licence for people who want to run their own analytics server rather than buy a hosted service.

read the full Fathom Lite overview →

About Swetrix

Swetrix is a cookieless, GDPR compliant, open source web analytics platform for teams that want privacy first traffic metrics plus error tracking, performance monitoring, session replays, funnels and custom events in one hosted or self hosted product.

read the full Swetrix overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 115K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

grafana vs posthog sentry vs posthog posthog vs umami posthog vs plausible umami vs plausible posthog vs matomo umami vs matomo posthog vs rybbit firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase

More Web & Product Analytics projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Web & Product Analytics field.

Fathom Lite vs PostHog Fathom Lite vs Umami Fathom Lite vs Plausible Fathom Lite vs Matomo Fathom Lite vs Rybbit Fathom Lite vs Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor Fathom Lite vs firebase-ios-sdk Fathom Lite vs Countly Fathom Lite vs shynet Fathom Lite vs tianji Fathom Lite vs OpenWebAnalytics Fathom Lite vs talivia

Frequently asked questions

Is Fathom Lite or Swetrix more popular?

Fathom Lite has 8,020 GitHub stars and Swetrix has 1,201. Fathom Lite has the larger community by that measure.

Are Fathom Lite and Swetrix free?

Both are open source. Fathom Lite is licensed under MIT and Swetrix under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Fathom Lite and Swetrix?

Fathom Lite is written in Go and Swetrix in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Fathom Lite or Swetrix?

Choose Fathom Lite if you want the larger community (8,020 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Swetrix if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.