head to head · open source

Umami vs Fathom Lite

Umami has 38,912 GitHub stars, 8,083 forks, 127 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Fathom Lite has 8,020 stars, 383 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. Umami leads on adoption by 385% (38,912 vs 8,020 stars). Umami is written in TypeScript under MIT; Fathom Lite is written in Go under MIT. Umami has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, Fathom Lite 5%. Umami was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (analytics, google-analytics), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Umami ★ 39K Fathom Lite ★ 8.0K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Umami Fathom Lite
GitHub stars ★ 39K ★ 8.0K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-03-18
Forks ⑂ 8.1K ⑂ 383
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Umami if

  • You weight community size — 39K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Umami profile →

pick Fathom Lite if

  • You want the Fathom Lite feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Fathom Lite fits your workflow better

full Fathom Lite profile →

About Umami

Umami is a privacy first, open source web and product analytics platform that gives site owners and product teams traffic, campaign, behavior, conversion and revenue reporting without cookies or surveillance, run either self hosted or in the cloud.

read the full Umami overview →

About Fathom Lite

Fathom Lite is the original open source, self hosted edition of Fathom Analytics — a simple, privacy focused website analytics tool written in Go with a Preact dashboard, released under the MIT licence for people who want to run their own analytics server rather than buy a hosted service.

read the full Fathom Lite overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 115K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

posthog vs umami umami vs plausible umami vs matomo grafana vs posthog sentry vs posthog posthog vs plausible posthog vs matomo posthog vs rybbit firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase

More Web & Product Analytics projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Web & Product Analytics field.

Umami vs PostHog Umami vs Plausible Umami vs Matomo Umami vs Rybbit Umami vs Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor Umami vs firebase-ios-sdk Umami vs Countly Umami vs shynet Umami vs tianji Umami vs OpenWebAnalytics Umami vs talivia Umami vs Aptabase

Frequently asked questions

Is Umami or Fathom Lite more popular?

Umami has 38,912 GitHub stars and Fathom Lite has 8,020. Umami has the larger community by that measure.

Are Umami and Fathom Lite free?

Both are open source. Umami is licensed under MIT and Fathom Lite under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Umami and Fathom Lite?

Umami is written in TypeScript and Fathom Lite in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Umami or Fathom Lite?

Choose Umami if you want the larger community (38,912 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Fathom Lite if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.