head to head · open source
SWE-agent vs Omnigent
SWE-agent has 20,710 GitHub stars, 2,263 forks, 102 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. Omnigent has 11,163 stars, 1,837 forks, 1,315 open issues and last shipped yesterday. SWE-agent leads on adoption by 86% (20,710 vs 11,163 stars). SWE-agent is written in Python under MIT; Omnigent is written in Python under Apache-2.0. SWE-agent has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, Omnigent 16%. Omnigent was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (ai, developer-tools, llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| SWE-agent | Omnigent | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 21K | ★ 11K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-26 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.3K | ⑂ 1.8K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick SWE-agent if
- You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Omnigent if
- You want the Omnigent feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and Omnigent fits your workflow better
About SWE-agent
[!warning] Most of our current development effort is on mini swe agent, which has superseded SWE agent. It matches the performance performance of SWE agent, while being much simpler. See the FAQ for more details about the differences. Our general recommendation is to use mini SWE agent instead of SWE agent going forward. SWE agent enables your language model of choice (e.g. GPT 4o or Claude Sonnet 4) to autonomously use tools to fix issues in real GitHub repositories, find cybersecurity vulnerabilities, or perform any custom task. ✅ State of the art on SWE bench among open source projects ✅ Free flowing &…
read the full SWE-agent overview →
About Omnigent
Omnigent The open source meta harness for all your AI agents. Omnigent is an open source meta harness that gives you a common orchestration layer over Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, Hermes, Pi, and the agents you write yourself: swap or combine harnesses without rewriting, enforce policies and sandboxing, and collaborate in real time from any device — terminal, browser, phone, or the native desktop app. omnigent.ai · ⬇️ Download the macOS desktop app Why Omnigent? Omnigent lets you: 📱 Work with agents from any device, including your phone. Sessions follow you: start in your terminal, continue in the…
read the full Omnigent overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More AI Assisted Coding projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Assisted Coding field.
Frequently asked questions
Is SWE-agent or Omnigent more popular?
SWE-agent has 20,710 GitHub stars and Omnigent has 11,163. SWE-agent has the larger community by that measure.
Are SWE-agent and Omnigent free?
Both are open source. SWE-agent is licensed under MIT and Omnigent under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between SWE-agent and Omnigent?
SWE-agent is written in Python and Omnigent in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, SWE-agent or Omnigent?
Choose SWE-agent if you want the larger community (20,710 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Omnigent if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.