head to head · open source

Supabase vs Structr

Supabase has 109,900 GitHub stars, 14,114 forks, 1,128 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Structr has 830 stars, 161 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. Supabase leads on adoption by 13,141% (109,900 vs 830 stars). Supabase is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; Structr is written in Java under a custom or non-standard licence. Supabase has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, Structr 19%. Supabase was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Supabase ★ 110K Structr ★ 830 category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Supabase Structr
GitHub stars ★ 110K ★ 830
License Apache-2.0 Custom / other
Written in TypeScript Java
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-10
Forks ⑂ 14K ⑂ 161
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Supabase if

  • You weight community size — 110K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Supabase profile →

pick Structr if

  • You want the Structr feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and Structr fits your workflow better

full Structr profile →

About Supabase

Supabase is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed Postgres development platform that bundles a dedicated Postgres database with authentication, auto generated APIs, realtime subscriptions, file storage, and edge functions for developers building web, mobile, and AI applications.

read the full Supabase overview →

About Structr

Structr is an open source, generic low code development and runtime platform built on a graph database, aimed at developers and teams who need to model, build, and operate fully custom applications rather than configure a prebuilt product.

read the full Structr overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K Zed ★ 90K

Related comparisons

langflow vs supabase supabase vs hercules supabase vs argos langflow vs pocketbase langflow vs tooljet langflow vs appsmith langflow vs tiptap langflow vs directus langflow vs budibase langflow vs onlook opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

Supabase vs Langflow Supabase vs PocketBase Supabase vs ToolJet Supabase vs AppSmith Supabase vs TipTap Supabase vs Directus Supabase vs Budibase Supabase vs Onlook Supabase vs Teable Supabase vs Convex Supabase vs Alokai Supabase vs KeystoneJS

Frequently asked questions

Is Supabase or Structr more popular?

Supabase has 109,900 GitHub stars and Structr has 830. Supabase has the larger community by that measure.

Are Supabase and Structr free?

Both are open source. Supabase is licensed under Apache-2.0, and Structr has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Supabase and Structr?

Supabase is written in TypeScript and Structr in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Supabase or Structr?

Choose Supabase if you want the larger community (109,900 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Structr if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.