head to head · open source

Supabase vs skaffold

Supabase has 110,952 GitHub stars, 15,455 forks, 1,128 open issues and last shipped today. skaffold has 15,897 stars, 1,705 forks, 914 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Supabase leads on adoption by 598% (110,952 vs 15,897 stars). Supabase is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; skaffold is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Supabase has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, skaffold 11%. Supabase was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Supabase ★ 111K skaffold ★ 16K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Supabase skaffold
GitHub stars ★ 111K ★ 16K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-10-01 2026-09-28
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 1.7K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Supabase if

  • You weight community size — 111K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Supabase profile →

pick skaffold if

  • You want the skaffold feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and skaffold fits your workflow better

full skaffold profile →

About Supabase

Supabase is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed Postgres development platform that bundles a dedicated Postgres database with authentication, auto generated APIs, realtime subscriptions, file storage, and edge functions for developers building web, mobile, and AI applications.

read the full Supabase overview →

About skaffold

Skaffold is a command line tool for continuous development of Kubernetes applications, aimed at developers who iterate on source code locally and deploy it to local or remote Kubernetes clusters.

read the full skaffold overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 270K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 211K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 111K

Related comparisons

ecc vs supabase react vs supabase supabase vs appwrite openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

Supabase vs ECC Supabase vs react Supabase vs Langflow Supabase vs puppeteer Supabase vs archify Supabase vs PocketBase Supabase vs i-have-adhd Supabase vs codebase-memory-mcp Supabase vs herdr Supabase vs ToolJet Supabase vs AppSmith Supabase vs it-tools

Frequently asked questions

Is Supabase or skaffold more popular?

Supabase has 110,952 GitHub stars and skaffold has 15,897. Supabase has the larger community by that measure.

Are Supabase and skaffold free?

Both are open source. Supabase is licensed under Apache-2.0 and skaffold under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Supabase and skaffold?

Supabase is written in TypeScript and skaffold in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Supabase or skaffold?

Choose Supabase if you want the larger community (110,952 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose skaffold if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.