head to head · open source

Supabase vs serving

Supabase has 110,097 GitHub stars, 14,262 forks, 1,128 open issues and last shipped yesterday. serving has 6,094 stars, 1,235 forks, 165 open issues and last shipped 25 days ago. Supabase leads on adoption by 1,707% (110,097 vs 6,094 stars). Supabase is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; serving is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Supabase has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, serving 20%. Supabase was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Supabase ★ 110K serving ★ 6.1K category Developer Tools

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Supabase serving
GitHub stars ★ 110K ★ 6.1K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-08-25
Forks ⑂ 14K ⑂ 1.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Supabase if

  • You weight community size — 110K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Supabase profile →

pick serving if

  • You want the serving feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and serving fits your workflow better

full serving profile →

About Supabase

Supabase is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed Postgres development platform that bundles a dedicated Postgres database with authentication, auto generated APIs, realtime subscriptions, file storage, and edge functions for developers building web, mobile, and AI applications.

read the full Supabase overview →

About serving

Knative Serving is an Apache 2.0 licensed, Go based Kubernetes component that deploys and serves applications and functions as serverless containers, built for platform engineers and developers who run workloads on Kubernetes and need request driven, scale to zero compute without leaving their own cluster.

read the full serving overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 262K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

react vs supabase supabase vs appwrite openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow n8n vs langflow react vs pocketbase langflow vs langchain react vs tooljet react vs appsmith openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

Supabase vs ECC Supabase vs react Supabase vs Langflow Supabase vs puppeteer Supabase vs archify Supabase vs PocketBase Supabase vs ToolJet Supabase vs AppSmith Supabase vs it-tools Supabase vs herdr Supabase vs lapce Supabase vs TipTap

Frequently asked questions

Is Supabase or serving more popular?

Supabase has 110,097 GitHub stars and serving has 6,094. Supabase has the larger community by that measure.

Are Supabase and serving free?

Both are open source. Supabase is licensed under Apache-2.0 and serving under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Supabase and serving?

Supabase is written in TypeScript and serving in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Supabase or serving?

Choose Supabase if you want the larger community (110,097 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose serving if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.