head to head · open source

Supabase vs rnx-kit

Supabase has 111,102 GitHub stars, 15,806 forks, 1,128 open issues and last shipped today. rnx-kit has 1,737 stars, 119 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped today. Supabase leads on adoption by 6,296% (111,102 vs 1,737 stars). Supabase is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; rnx-kit is written in TypeScript under MIT. Supabase has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, rnx-kit 7%. Supabase was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Supabase ★ 111K rnx-kit ★ 1.7K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Supabase rnx-kit
GitHub stars ★ 111K ★ 1.7K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-10-05 2026-10-05
Forks ⑂ 16K ⑂ 119
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Supabase if

  • You weight community size — 111K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Supabase profile →

pick rnx-kit if

  • You want the rnx-kit feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and rnx-kit fits your workflow better

full rnx-kit profile →

About Supabase

Supabase is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed Postgres development platform that bundles a dedicated Postgres database with authentication, auto generated APIs, realtime subscriptions, file storage, and edge functions for developers building web, mobile, and AI applications.

read the full Supabase overview →

About rnx-kit

rnx kit is a collection of MIT licensed TypeScript tools built by Microsoft engineers for React Native developers who need to manage dependencies, bundle code, and build mobile apps consistently across large projects.

read the full rnx-kit overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 273K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 194K Langflow ★ 156K pi ★ 113K

Related comparisons

ecc vs supabase react vs supabase supabase vs appwrite openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

Supabase vs ECC Supabase vs react Supabase vs Langflow Supabase vs puppeteer Supabase vs archify Supabase vs PocketBase Supabase vs i-have-adhd Supabase vs codebase-memory-mcp Supabase vs herdr Supabase vs ToolJet Supabase vs AppSmith Supabase vs it-tools

Frequently asked questions

Is Supabase or rnx-kit more popular?

Supabase has 111,102 GitHub stars and rnx-kit has 1,737. Supabase has the larger community by that measure.

Are Supabase and rnx-kit free?

Both are open source. Supabase is licensed under Apache-2.0 and rnx-kit under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Supabase and rnx-kit?

Supabase is written in TypeScript and rnx-kit in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Supabase or rnx-kit?

Choose Supabase if you want the larger community (111,102 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose rnx-kit if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.