head to head · open source

Supabase vs msw

Supabase has 110,097 GitHub stars, 14,262 forks, 1,128 open issues and last shipped yesterday. msw has 18,210 stars, 626 forks, 37 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Supabase leads on adoption by 505% (110,097 vs 18,210 stars). Supabase is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; msw is written in TypeScript under MIT. Supabase has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, msw 3%. Supabase was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Supabase ★ 110K msw ★ 18K category Developer Tools

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Supabase msw
GitHub stars ★ 110K ★ 18K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 14K ⑂ 626
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Supabase if

  • You weight community size — 110K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Supabase profile →

pick msw if

  • You want the msw feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and msw fits your workflow better

full msw profile →

About Supabase

Supabase is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed Postgres development platform that bundles a dedicated Postgres database with authentication, auto generated APIs, realtime subscriptions, file storage, and edge functions for developers building web, mobile, and AI applications.

read the full Supabase overview →

About msw

Mock Service Worker (MSW) is an MIT licensed TypeScript library that intercepts network requests at the Service Worker level so JavaScript applications and tests can run against mocked APIs without any change to application code, and it is built for front end and full stack JavaScript developers who need consistent API mocking in the browser, in tests, and during local development.

read the full msw overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 262K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

react vs supabase supabase vs appwrite openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow n8n vs langflow react vs pocketbase langflow vs langchain react vs tooljet react vs appsmith openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

Supabase vs ECC Supabase vs react Supabase vs Langflow Supabase vs puppeteer Supabase vs archify Supabase vs PocketBase Supabase vs ToolJet Supabase vs AppSmith Supabase vs it-tools Supabase vs herdr Supabase vs lapce Supabase vs TipTap

Frequently asked questions

Is Supabase or msw more popular?

Supabase has 110,097 GitHub stars and msw has 18,210. Supabase has the larger community by that measure.

Are Supabase and msw free?

Both are open source. Supabase is licensed under Apache-2.0 and msw under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Supabase and msw?

Supabase is written in TypeScript and msw in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Supabase or msw?

Choose Supabase if you want the larger community (110,097 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose msw if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.