head to head · open source

Supabase vs KeystoneJS

Supabase has 109,900 GitHub stars, 14,114 forks, 1,128 open issues and last shipped yesterday. KeystoneJS has 9,974 stars, 1,263 forks, 138 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Supabase leads on adoption by 1,002% (109,900 vs 9,974 stars). Supabase is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; KeystoneJS is written in TypeScript under MIT. Supabase has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, KeystoneJS 13%. Supabase was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Supabase ★ 110K KeystoneJS ★ 10.0K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Supabase KeystoneJS
GitHub stars ★ 110K ★ 10.0K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 14K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Supabase if

  • You weight community size — 110K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Supabase profile →

pick KeystoneJS if

  • You want the KeystoneJS feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and KeystoneJS fits your workflow better

full KeystoneJS profile →

About Supabase

Supabase is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed Postgres development platform that bundles a dedicated Postgres database with authentication, auto generated APIs, realtime subscriptions, file storage, and edge functions for developers building web, mobile, and AI applications.

read the full Supabase overview →

About KeystoneJS

KeystoneJS is an open source Node.js CMS and application framework written in TypeScript and licensed under the MIT License. It lives in the Node.js, GraphQL, and React ecosystem, and its GitHub description calls it a headless CMS for Node.js. The project addresses the need to build a custom back end without writing all of the common content management plumbing by hand.

read the full KeystoneJS overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K Zed ★ 90K

Related comparisons

langflow vs supabase supabase vs hercules supabase vs argos langflow vs pocketbase langflow vs tooljet langflow vs appsmith langflow vs tiptap langflow vs directus langflow vs budibase langflow vs onlook opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

Supabase vs Langflow Supabase vs PocketBase Supabase vs ToolJet Supabase vs AppSmith Supabase vs TipTap Supabase vs Directus Supabase vs Budibase Supabase vs Onlook Supabase vs Teable Supabase vs Convex Supabase vs Alokai Supabase vs HeyForm

Frequently asked questions

Is Supabase or KeystoneJS more popular?

Supabase has 109,900 GitHub stars and KeystoneJS has 9,974. Supabase has the larger community by that measure.

Are Supabase and KeystoneJS free?

Both are open source. Supabase is licensed under Apache-2.0 and KeystoneJS under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Supabase and KeystoneJS?

Supabase is written in TypeScript and KeystoneJS in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Supabase or KeystoneJS?

Choose Supabase if you want the larger community (109,900 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose KeystoneJS if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.