head to head · open source

Supabase vs gitlogue

Supabase has 110,097 GitHub stars, 14,262 forks, 1,128 open issues and last shipped yesterday. gitlogue has 4,983 stars, 114 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Supabase leads on adoption by 2,109% (110,097 vs 4,983 stars). Supabase is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; gitlogue is written in Rust under ISC. Supabase has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, gitlogue 2%. Supabase was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Supabase ★ 110K gitlogue ★ 5.0K category Developer Tools

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Supabase gitlogue
GitHub stars ★ 110K ★ 5.0K
License Apache-2.0 ISC
Written in TypeScript Rust
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 14K ⑂ 114
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Supabase if

  • You weight community size — 110K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Supabase profile →

pick gitlogue if

  • You want the gitlogue feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the ISC license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and gitlogue fits your workflow better

full gitlogue profile →

About Supabase

Supabase is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed Postgres development platform that bundles a dedicated Postgres database with authentication, auto generated APIs, realtime subscriptions, file storage, and edge functions for developers building web, mobile, and AI applications.

read the full Supabase overview →

About gitlogue

gitlogue is a cinematic Git commit replay tool for the terminal that turns a repository's commit history into an animated story with realistic typing, syntax highlighting and file tree transitions, aimed at developers who want to watch code change over time rather than read it as static log output.

read the full gitlogue overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 262K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

react vs supabase supabase vs appwrite openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow n8n vs langflow react vs pocketbase langflow vs langchain react vs tooljet react vs appsmith openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

Supabase vs ECC Supabase vs react Supabase vs Langflow Supabase vs puppeteer Supabase vs archify Supabase vs PocketBase Supabase vs ToolJet Supabase vs AppSmith Supabase vs it-tools Supabase vs herdr Supabase vs lapce Supabase vs TipTap

Frequently asked questions

Is Supabase or gitlogue more popular?

Supabase has 110,097 GitHub stars and gitlogue has 4,983. Supabase has the larger community by that measure.

Are Supabase and gitlogue free?

Both are open source. Supabase is licensed under Apache-2.0 and gitlogue under ISC. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Supabase and gitlogue?

Supabase is written in TypeScript and gitlogue in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Supabase or gitlogue?

Choose Supabase if you want the larger community (110,097 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose gitlogue if its feature set, stack or ISC licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.