head to head · open source
Suna vs Portkey AI Gateway
Suna has 20,354 GitHub stars, 3,440 forks, 74 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Portkey AI Gateway has 13,302 stars, 1,365 forks, 262 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. Suna leads on adoption by 53% (20,354 vs 13,302 stars). Suna is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; Portkey AI Gateway is written in TypeScript under MIT. Suna has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, Portkey AI Gateway 10%. Suna was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Suna | Portkey AI Gateway | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 20K | ★ 13K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-05-25 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.4K | ⑂ 1.4K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Suna if
- You weight community size — 20K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Portkey AI Gateway if
- You want the Portkey AI Gateway feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Portkey AI Gateway fits your workflow better
About Suna
Kortix The open source AI Management System The leading open source alternative to Claude Cowork and ChatGPT Work. Website · Documentation · Cloud · Manifesto Agents that deliver finished work — reports, decks, code, replies, deployed changes — are now a product category. Every version of it runs inside a model lab, on that lab's model, with your company's brain on their side of the wall. Kortix is the one you own. It's an open source AI Management System : your agents, the skills they share, your company memory, and every connector live in one git repo — versioned, diffable, and shared by the whole company. The…
About Portkey AI Gateway
English 中文 日本語 [!IMPORTANT] :rocket: Gateway 2.0 (Pre Release) Portkey's core enterprise gateway is merging into open source with our 2.0 release. You can try the pre release branch here. Read more about what's next for Portkey in our Series A announcement . 🆕 Portkey Models Open source LLM pricing for 2,300+ models across 40+ providers. Explore → AI Gateway Route to 250+ LLMs with 1 fast & friendly API Docs Enterprise Hosted Gateway Changelog API Reference The AI Gateway is designed for fast, reliable & secure routing to 1600+ language, vision, audio, and image models. It is a lightweight, open source, and…
read the full Portkey AI Gateway overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Development Platforms projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Development Platforms field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Suna or Portkey AI Gateway more popular?
Suna has 20,354 GitHub stars and Portkey AI Gateway has 13,302. Suna has the larger community by that measure.
Are Suna and Portkey AI Gateway free?
Both are open source. Suna has no licence declared in this registry, and Portkey AI Gateway is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Suna and Portkey AI Gateway?
Suna is written in TypeScript and Portkey AI Gateway in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Suna or Portkey AI Gateway?
Choose Suna if you want the larger community (20,354 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Portkey AI Gateway if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.