head to head · open source
PaddleOCR vs Suna
PaddleOCR has 92,143 GitHub stars, 11,613 forks, 243 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Suna has 20,354 stars, 3,440 forks, 74 open issues and last shipped yesterday. PaddleOCR leads on adoption by 353% (92,143 vs 20,354 stars). PaddleOCR is written in Python under Apache-2.0; Suna is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence. PaddleOCR has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, Suna 17%. Suna was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| PaddleOCR | Suna | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 92K | ★ 20K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Custom / other |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-16 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 12K | ⑂ 3.4K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick PaddleOCR if
- You weight community size — 92K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Suna if
- You want the Suna feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Suna fits your workflow better
About PaddleOCR
Global Leading OCR Toolkit & Document AI Engine English 简体中文 繁體中文 日本語 한국어 Français Русский Español العربية PaddleOCR converts PDF documents and images into structured, LLM ready data (JSON/Markdown) with industry leading accuracy. With 70k+ Stars and trusted by top tier projects like Dify, RAGFlow, and Cherry Studio, PaddleOCR is the bedrock for building intelligent RAG and Agentic applications. 🚀 Key Features 📄 Intelligent Document Parsing (LLM Ready) Transforming messy visuals into structured data for the LLM era. SOTA Document VLM : Featuring PaddleOCR VL 1.6 (0.9B) , the industry's leading lightweight…
read the full PaddleOCR overview →
About Suna
Kortix The open source AI Management System The leading open source alternative to Claude Cowork and ChatGPT Work. Website · Documentation · Cloud · Manifesto Agents that deliver finished work — reports, decks, code, replies, deployed changes — are now a product category. Every version of it runs inside a model lab, on that lab's model, with your company's brain on their side of the wall. Kortix is the one you own. It's an open source AI Management System : your agents, the skills they share, your company memory, and every connector live in one git repo — versioned, diffable, and shared by the whole company. The…
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Development Platforms projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Development Platforms field.
Frequently asked questions
Is PaddleOCR or Suna more popular?
PaddleOCR has 92,143 GitHub stars and Suna has 20,354. PaddleOCR has the larger community by that measure.
Are PaddleOCR and Suna free?
Both are open source. PaddleOCR is licensed under Apache-2.0, and Suna has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between PaddleOCR and Suna?
PaddleOCR is written in Python and Suna in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, PaddleOCR or Suna?
Choose PaddleOCR if you want the larger community (92,143 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Suna if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.