head to head · open source

Tuta vs Stoat

Tuta has 7,925 GitHub stars, 639 forks, 1,001 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Stoat has 3,336 stars, 388 forks, 139 open issues and last shipped today. Tuta leads on adoption by 138% (7,925 vs 3,336 stars). Tuta is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0; Stoat is written in Rust under a custom or non-standard licence. Tuta has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Stoat 12%. Stoat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Tuta ★ 7.9K Stoat ★ 3.3K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Tuta Stoat
GitHub stars ★ 7.9K ★ 3.3K
License GPL-3.0 Custom / other
Written in TypeScript Rust
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 639 ⑂ 388
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Tuta if

  • You weight community size — 7.9K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Tuta profile →

pick Stoat if

  • You want the Stoat feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and Stoat fits your workflow better

full Stoat profile →

About Tuta

Tuta is an open source, end to end encrypted email, calendar and contacts service for individuals and teams who need private communication to work across every device they own.

read the full Tuta overview →

About Stoat

Stoat is a Rust backend project that provides the services and libraries powering the Stoat group chat service. The repository is organized around core crates for configuration, database implementation, files, API models, permissions, presence, result types, and a coalesced crate.

read the full Stoat overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault

More Data Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Security & Privacy field.

Tuta vs Puter Tuta vs Mattermost Tuta vs Signal Tuta vs Ente Tuta vs Element Tuta vs Fluxer Tuta vs certificates Tuta vs Zen Tuta vs Cinny Tuta vs Certipy Tuta vs Quiet Tuta vs Wire

Frequently asked questions

Is Tuta or Stoat more popular?

Tuta has 7,925 GitHub stars and Stoat has 3,336. Tuta has the larger community by that measure.

Are Tuta and Stoat free?

Both are open source. Tuta is licensed under GPL-3.0, and Stoat has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Tuta and Stoat?

Tuta is written in TypeScript and Stoat in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Tuta or Stoat?

Choose Tuta if you want the larger community (7,925 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Stoat if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.