head to head · open source

srs vs mirotalksfu

srs has 29,249 GitHub stars, 5,694 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped yesterday. mirotalksfu has 3,103 stars, 500 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. srs leads on adoption by 843% (29,249 vs 3,103 stars). srs is written in C++ under MIT; mirotalksfu is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0. srs has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, mirotalksfu 16%. mirotalksfu was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (live-streaming), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

srs ★ 29K mirotalksfu ★ 3.1K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

srs mirotalksfu
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 3.1K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in C++ JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 5.7K ⑂ 500
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick srs if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full srs profile →

pick mirotalksfu if

  • You want the mirotalksfu feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and mirotalksfu fits your workflow better

full mirotalksfu profile →

About srs

SRS (Simple Realtime Server) is an open source, AI driven real time media server written in C++ and released under the MIT license. It ingests and republishes live audio and video across a broad set of streaming protocols, including RTMP, WebRTC, HLS, HTTP FLV, HTTP TS, SRT, MPEG DASH, and GB28181. The project runs on Linux and macOS and is built for x86 64, ARMv7, AArch64, Apple M1, RISC V, LoongArch, and MIPS architectures. Codec support covers H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9, AAC, Opus, and G.711. The current line is SRS 8.0, and the project has been developed for roughly eleven years, with documentation published in b…

read the full srs overview →

About mirotalksfu

MiroTalk SFU is a self hosted, open source WebRTC video conferencing platform written in JavaScript and built on the Mediasoup selective forwarding unit architecture. It provides real time communication and collaboration features for rooms, screen sharing, chat, file sharing, live streaming, and recording, while allowing organizations to run the service on their own server. The project positions itself as an alternative to Zoom, Google Meet, Jitsi Meet, and Microsoft Teams.

read the full mirotalksfu overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

plane vs srs plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor plane vs hrms plane vs ever-gauzy twenty vs hrms twenty vs ever-gauzy odoo vs hrms odoo vs ever-gauzy plane vs horilla twenty vs horilla

More Collaboration & Communication projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.

srs vs Plane srs vs Rocket.Chat srs vs cobalt srs vs Buzz srs vs Jitsi srs vs Huly srs vs Zulip srs vs etherpad srs vs drawnix srs vs univer srs vs chat srs vs bigbluebutton

Frequently asked questions

Is srs or mirotalksfu more popular?

srs has 29,249 GitHub stars and mirotalksfu has 3,103. srs has the larger community by that measure.

Are srs and mirotalksfu free?

Both are open source. srs is licensed under MIT and mirotalksfu under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between srs and mirotalksfu?

srs is written in C++ and mirotalksfu in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, srs or mirotalksfu?

Choose srs if you want the larger community (29,249 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose mirotalksfu if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.