head to head · open source
srs vs mirotalksfu
srs has 29,414 GitHub stars, 5,708 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. mirotalksfu has 3,144 stars, 518 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. srs leads on adoption by 836% (29,414 vs 3,144 stars). srs is written in C++ under MIT; mirotalksfu is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0. srs has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, mirotalksfu 16%. mirotalksfu was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (live-streaming), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| srs | mirotalksfu | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 29K | ★ 3.1K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | C++ | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.7K | ⑂ 518 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick srs if
- You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick mirotalksfu if
- You want the mirotalksfu feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and mirotalksfu fits your workflow better
About srs
SRS(Simple Realtime Server) SRS/8.0 (Free) is a simple, high performance, AI driven real time media server. It supports RTMP, WebRTC, HLS, HTTP FLV, SRT, MPEG DASH, and GB28181 on Linux and macOS across x86 64, ARMv7, AArch64, Apple M1, RISC V, LoongArch, and MIPS architectures. Supported codecs include H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9, AAC, Opus, and G.711. See the complete list of features. Note: For more details on the single node architecture for SRS, please visit the following link. SRS is licenced under MIT, and some third party libraries are distributed under their licenses. Usage Please check the Getting Started…
About mirotalksfu
MiroTalk SFU Open Source Self Hosted WebRTC Video Conferencing Platform Self hosted, open source WebRTC video conferencing platform for real time communication and collaboration. A modern alternative to Zoom, Google Meet, Jitsi Meet, and Microsoft Teams, powered by scalable SFU architecture with Mediasoup. MiroTalk SFU is a self hosted, open source video conferencing platform built on mediasoup SFU architecture for scalable real time communication. A powerful alternative to Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams for video conferencing, collaboration, and streaming. Deploy it on your own server and keep full…
read the full mirotalksfu overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Collaboration & Communication projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.
Frequently asked questions
Is srs or mirotalksfu more popular?
srs has 29,414 GitHub stars and mirotalksfu has 3,144. srs has the larger community by that measure.
Are srs and mirotalksfu free?
Both are open source. srs is licensed under MIT and mirotalksfu under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between srs and mirotalksfu?
srs is written in C++ and mirotalksfu in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, srs or mirotalksfu?
Choose srs if you want the larger community (29,414 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose mirotalksfu if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.