head to head · open source
Fizzy vs SparkleShare
Fizzy has 8,283 GitHub stars, 1,212 forks, 67 open issues and last shipped yesterday. SparkleShare has 4,999 stars, 569 forks, 69 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Fizzy leads on adoption by 66% (8,283 vs 4,999 stars). Fizzy is written in Ruby under a custom or non-standard licence; SparkleShare is written in C# under GPL-3.0. Fizzy has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, SparkleShare 11%. Fizzy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Fizzy | SparkleShare | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 8.3K | ★ 5.0K |
| License | Custom / other | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Ruby | C# |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-09-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.2K | ⑂ 569 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Fizzy if
- You weight community size — 8.3K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches Ruby
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick SparkleShare if
- You want the SparkleShare feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and SparkleShare fits your workflow better
About Fizzy
Fizzy This is the source code of Fizzy, the Kanban tracking tool for issues and ideas by 37signals. Running your own Fizzy instance If you want to run your own Fizzy instance, but don't need to change its code, you can use our pre built Docker image. You'll need access to a server on which you can run Docker, and you'll need to configure some options to customize your installation. You can find the details of how to do a Docker based deployment in our Docker deployment guide. If you want more flexibility to customize your Fizzy installation by changing its code, and deploy those changes to your server, then we…
read the full Fizzy overview →
About SparkleShare
SparkleShare [!NOTE] Please read 🌱 issue 2006 for the future of this project. [!IMPORTANT] Hello! Hylke here. I was recently laid off . I'd love to work full time creating apps for Linux and contributing design for FOSS projects . I hope to gather enough monthly sponsors for a minimum wage. Every little helps. Thank you. SparkleShare is a file sharing and collaboration app. It works just like Dropbox, and you can run it on your own server. It's available for Linux distributions, macOS, and Windows. You can support this project through 💕 GitHub Sponsors. How does it work? SparkleShare creates a special folder…
read the full SparkleShare overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Project & Work Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Project & Work Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Fizzy or SparkleShare more popular?
Fizzy has 8,283 GitHub stars and SparkleShare has 4,999. Fizzy has the larger community by that measure.
Are Fizzy and SparkleShare free?
Both are open source. Fizzy has no licence declared in this registry, and SparkleShare is licensed under GPL-3.0. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Fizzy and SparkleShare?
Fizzy is written in Ruby and SparkleShare in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Fizzy or SparkleShare?
Choose Fizzy if you want the larger community (8,283 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose SparkleShare if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.