head to head · open source
Skyvern vs webclaw
Skyvern has 23,340 GitHub stars, 2,235 forks, 234 open issues and last shipped yesterday. webclaw has 2,429 stars, 242 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Skyvern leads on adoption by 861% (23,340 vs 2,429 stars). Skyvern is written in Python under AGPL-3.0; webclaw is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0. Skyvern has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, webclaw 10%. Skyvern was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Skyvern | webclaw | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 23K | ★ 2.4K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-05 | 2026-11-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.2K | ⑂ 242 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Skyvern if
- You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick webclaw if
- You want the webclaw feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and webclaw fits your workflow better
About Skyvern
🐉 Automate Browser based workflows using LLMs and Computer Vision 🐉 Skyvern automates browser based workflows using LLMs and computer vision. It provides a Playwright compatible SDK that adds AI functionality on top of playwright, as well as a no code workflow builder to help both technical and non technical users automate manual workflows on any website, replacing brittle or unreliable automation solutions. Traditional approaches to browser automations required writing custom scripts for websites, often relying on DOM parsing and XPath based interactions which would break whenever the website layouts changed…
read the full Skyvern overview →
About webclaw
English 简体中文 webclaw Turn websites into clean markdown, JSON, and LLM ready context. CLI, MCP server, REST API, and SDKs for AI agents and RAG pipelines. Most web scraping tools give your agent one of two bad outputs: a blocked page, login wall, or empty app shell raw HTML full of nav, scripts, styling, ads, and duplicated boilerplate webclaw.io is the hosted web extraction API for webclaw. This repo contains the open source CLI, MCP server, extraction engine, and self hostable server. webclaw turns a URL into clean content your tools can actually use. Use it from the terminal, wire it into Claude/Cursor through…
read the full webclaw overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Skyvern or webclaw more popular?
Skyvern has 23,340 GitHub stars and webclaw has 2,429. Skyvern has the larger community by that measure.
Are Skyvern and webclaw free?
Both are open source. Skyvern is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and webclaw under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Skyvern and webclaw?
Skyvern is written in Python and webclaw in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Skyvern or webclaw?
Choose Skyvern if you want the larger community (23,340 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose webclaw if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.