head to head · open source
Browser Use vs Skyvern
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars, 13,358 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Skyvern has 23,336 stars, 2,233 forks, 234 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Browser Use leads on adoption by 414% (119,857 vs 23,336 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; Skyvern is written in Python under AGPL-3.0. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, Skyvern 10%. Skyvern was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (browser-automation, llm, playwright), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | Skyvern | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 23K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 2.2K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Skyvern if
- You want the Skyvern feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and Skyvern fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About Skyvern
🐉 Automate Browser based workflows using LLMs and Computer Vision 🐉 Skyvern automates browser based workflows using LLMs and computer vision. It provides a Playwright compatible SDK that adds AI functionality on top of playwright, as well as a no code workflow builder to help both technical and non technical users automate manual workflows on any website, replacing brittle or unreliable automation solutions. Traditional approaches to browser automations required writing custom scripts for websites, often relying on DOM parsing and XPath based interactions which would break whenever the website layouts changed…
read the full Skyvern overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or Skyvern more popular?
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars and Skyvern has 23,336. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and Skyvern free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and Skyvern under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and Skyvern?
Browser Use is written in Python and Skyvern in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or Skyvern?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,857 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Skyvern if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.