head to head · open source
CloakBrowser vs Skyvern
CloakBrowser has 32,712 GitHub stars, 2,720 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Skyvern has 23,336 stars, 2,236 forks, 234 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CloakBrowser leads on adoption by 40% (32,712 vs 23,336 stars). CloakBrowser is written in Python under MIT; Skyvern is written in Python under AGPL-3.0. CloakBrowser has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Skyvern 10%. Skyvern was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (browser-automation, playwright), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CloakBrowser | Skyvern | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 23K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-11-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.7K | ⑂ 2.2K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CloakBrowser if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Skyvern if
- You want the Skyvern feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and Skyvern fits your workflow better
About CloakBrowser
Stealth Chromium that passes every bot detection test. Not a patched config. Not a JS injection. A real Chromium binary with fingerprints modified at the C++ source level. Antibot systems score it as a normal browser — because it is a normal browser. Cloudflare Turnstile — 3 live tests passing (headed mode, macOS) Drop in Playwright/Puppeteer replacement for Python and JavaScript. Same API, same code — just swap the import. 3 lines of code, 30 seconds to unblock. 87 source level C++ patches — canvas, WebGL, audio, fonts, GPU, screen, WebRTC, network timing, automation signals, CDP input behavior humanize=True —…
read the full CloakBrowser overview →
About Skyvern
🐉 Automate Browser based workflows using LLMs and Computer Vision 🐉 Skyvern automates browser based workflows using LLMs and computer vision. It provides a Playwright compatible SDK that adds AI functionality on top of playwright, as well as a no code workflow builder to help both technical and non technical users automate manual workflows on any website, replacing brittle or unreliable automation solutions. Traditional approaches to browser automations required writing custom scripts for websites, often relying on DOM parsing and XPath based interactions which would break whenever the website layouts changed…
read the full Skyvern overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CloakBrowser or Skyvern more popular?
CloakBrowser has 32,712 GitHub stars and Skyvern has 23,336. CloakBrowser has the larger community by that measure.
Are CloakBrowser and Skyvern free?
Both are open source. CloakBrowser is licensed under MIT and Skyvern under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CloakBrowser and Skyvern?
CloakBrowser is written in Python and Skyvern in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CloakBrowser or Skyvern?
Choose CloakBrowser if you want the larger community (32,712 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Skyvern if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.