head to head · open source
Skyvern vs stealth-browser-mcp
Skyvern has 23,336 GitHub stars, 2,236 forks, 234 open issues and last shipped yesterday. stealth-browser-mcp has 3,331 stars, 411 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Skyvern leads on adoption by 601% (23,336 vs 3,331 stars). Skyvern is written in Python under AGPL-3.0; stealth-browser-mcp is written in Python under MIT. Skyvern has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, stealth-browser-mcp 12%. Skyvern was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser-automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Skyvern | stealth-browser-mcp | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 23K | ★ 3.3K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.2K | ⑂ 411 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Skyvern if
- You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick stealth-browser-mcp if
- You want the stealth-browser-mcp feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and stealth-browser-mcp fits your workflow better
About Skyvern
🐉 Automate Browser based workflows using LLMs and Computer Vision 🐉 Skyvern automates browser based workflows using LLMs and computer vision. It provides a Playwright compatible SDK that adds AI functionality on top of playwright, as well as a no code workflow builder to help both technical and non technical users automate manual workflows on any website, replacing brittle or unreliable automation solutions. Traditional approaches to browser automations required writing custom scripts for websites, often relying on DOM parsing and XPath based interactions which would break whenever the website layouts changed…
read the full Skyvern overview →
About stealth-browser-mcp
Stealth Browser MCP Stealth browser automation for MCP compatible AI agents. Navigate Cloudflare challenges, anti bot checks, and login walls with real Chrome family browser instances powered by nodriver, Chrome DevTools Protocol, and FastMCP. Sponsors NodeMaven — The most efficient proxy provider for Web Scraping and Automation with the Highest Quality IP on the market. Why NodeMaven? ZIP targeting 99.9% uptime IP filtering: all proxies have fraud score RapidProxy powers scraping and automation with 90M+ residential IPs across 200+ countries, supporting rotation, geo targeting, and high concurrency to improve…
read the full stealth-browser-mcp overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Skyvern or stealth-browser-mcp more popular?
Skyvern has 23,336 GitHub stars and stealth-browser-mcp has 3,331. Skyvern has the larger community by that measure.
Are Skyvern and stealth-browser-mcp free?
Both are open source. Skyvern is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and stealth-browser-mcp under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Skyvern and stealth-browser-mcp?
Skyvern is written in Python and stealth-browser-mcp in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Skyvern or stealth-browser-mcp?
Choose Skyvern if you want the larger community (23,336 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose stealth-browser-mcp if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.