head to head · open source
Skyvern vs crw
Skyvern has 23,336 GitHub stars, 2,236 forks, 234 open issues and last shipped yesterday. crw has 1,221 stars, 97 forks, 10 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Skyvern leads on adoption by 1,811% (23,336 vs 1,221 stars). Skyvern is written in Python under AGPL-3.0; crw is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0. Skyvern has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, crw 8%. Skyvern was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai, llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Skyvern | crw | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 23K | ★ 1.2K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-11-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.2K | ⑂ 97 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Skyvern if
- You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick crw if
- You want the crw feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and crw fits your workflow better
About Skyvern
🐉 Automate Browser based workflows using LLMs and Computer Vision 🐉 Skyvern automates browser based workflows using LLMs and computer vision. It provides a Playwright compatible SDK that adds AI functionality on top of playwright, as well as a no code workflow builder to help both technical and non technical users automate manual workflows on any website, replacing brittle or unreliable automation solutions. Traditional approaches to browser automations required writing custom scripts for websites, often relying on DOM parsing and XPath based interactions which would break whenever the website layouts changed…
read the full Skyvern overview →
About crw
fastCRW Turn URLs into clean markdown or structured JSON with one engine for search, scrape, map, crawl, and extract. Run it locally as a small Rust binary or use the managed API. Get 1000 free credits → · Install · Docs No credit card. Continue with GitHub. One command install Runs local and free, no account needed. To use the Cloud, paste your key into the same command and it installs the binary, connects the key, and registers the MCP server with the AI coding tools you already have: Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, OpenCode and Windsurf are picked up automatically when they are already set up; nothing…
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Skyvern or crw more popular?
Skyvern has 23,336 GitHub stars and crw has 1,221. Skyvern has the larger community by that measure.
Are Skyvern and crw free?
Both are open source. Skyvern is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and crw under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Skyvern and crw?
Skyvern is written in Python and crw in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Skyvern or crw?
Choose Skyvern if you want the larger community (23,336 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose crw if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.