head to head · open source
SingleFile vs chatGPTBox
SingleFile has 22,811 GitHub stars, 1,432 forks, 101 open issues and last shipped yesterday. chatGPTBox has 10,772 stars, 881 forks, 211 open issues and last shipped yesterday. SingleFile leads on adoption by 112% (22,811 vs 10,772 stars). SingleFile is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; chatGPTBox is written in JavaScript under MIT. SingleFile has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, chatGPTBox 8%. SingleFile was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (chrome-extension, firefox-addon), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| SingleFile | chatGPTBox | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 23K | ★ 11K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.4K | ⑂ 881 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick SingleFile if
- You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick chatGPTBox if
- You want the chatGPTBox feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and chatGPTBox fits your workflow better
About SingleFile
SingleFile SingleFile helps you to save a complete web page into a single HTML file. SingleFile is a Web Extension (and a CLI tool) compatible with Chrome, Firefox (Desktop and Mobile), Microsoft Edge, Safari, Vivaldi, Brave, Waterfox, Yandex browser, and Opera. Table of Contents SingleFile Table of Contents Demo Install Getting started Additional notes FAQ Release notes Known Issues and Troubleshooting Command Line Interface (SingleFile CLI) Integration with user scripts File format comparison Projects using/compatible with SingleFile Privacy Policy Contributors Code derived from third party projects Icons…
read the full SingleFile overview →
About chatGPTBox
ChatGPTBox Deep ChatGPT integrations in your browser, completely for free. [![license][license image]][license url] [![release][release image]][release url] [ ][release url] [![verify][verify image]][verify url] [![coverage][coverage image]][coverage url] English Indonesia 简体中文 日本語 Türkçe Install [![Chrome][Chrome image]][Chrome url] [![Edge][Edge image]][Edge url] [![Firefox][Firefox image]][Firefox url] [![Safari][Safari image]][Safari url] [![Android][Android image]][Android url] [![GitHub][Github image]][Github url] Guide Preview [Development & Contributing][dev url] Video Demonstration Credits [dev url]…
read the full chatGPTBox overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is SingleFile or chatGPTBox more popular?
SingleFile has 22,811 GitHub stars and chatGPTBox has 10,772. SingleFile has the larger community by that measure.
Are SingleFile and chatGPTBox free?
Both are open source. SingleFile is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and chatGPTBox under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between SingleFile and chatGPTBox?
SingleFile is written in JavaScript and chatGPTBox in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, SingleFile or chatGPTBox?
Choose SingleFile if you want the larger community (22,811 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose chatGPTBox if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.