head to head · open source

Signal vs Zen

Signal has 29,352 GitHub stars, 6,888 forks, 498 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Zen has 4,225 stars, 143 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped 21 days ago. Signal leads on adoption by 595% (29,352 vs 4,225 stars). Signal is written in Kotlin under AGPL-3.0; Zen is written in Go under MIT. Signal has attracted 23% as many forks as stars, Zen 3%. Signal was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Signal ★ 29K Zen ★ 4.2K category Security & Privacy

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Signal Zen
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 4.2K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Kotlin Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-08-28
Forks ⑂ 6.9K ⑂ 143
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Signal if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Signal profile →

pick Zen if

  • You want the Zen feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Zen fits your workflow better

full Zen profile →

About Signal

Signal Android is a secure messaging application for Android devices that delivers private communication via end to end encryption. Developed by Signal Messenger, LLC, it operates within the broader Signal ecosystem, which includes official iOS and desktop clients. The app uses mobile data or Wi Fi to send and receive encrypted messages, voice calls, and video calls without relying on traditional SMS or telephony infrastructure.

read the full Signal overview →

About Zen

Zen is an open source desktop application written in Go for Windows, macOS, and Linux under the MIT license. It operates as a system wide ad blocker and privacy guard, so it applies to traffic from applications on the machine rather than only to browser tabs. It lives in the desktop security and privacy ecosystem, where users want filtering without browser extensions.

read the full Zen overview →

More in Security & Privacy

Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K JumpServer ★ 32K

Related comparisons

puter vs signal mattermost vs signal signal vs ente puter vs mattermost puter vs ente mattermost vs ente puter vs element puter vs fluxer puter vs vault mattermost vs vault puter vs unkey mattermost vs unkey puter vs phase puter vs keyshade vault vs unkey mattermost vs phase puter vs projectdiscovery mattermost vs projectdiscovery keycloak vs projectdiscovery tailscale vs projectdiscovery puter vs tracecat mattermost vs tracecat keycloak vs tracecat tailscale vs tracecat

More Data Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Security & Privacy field.

Signal vs Puter Signal vs Mattermost Signal vs Ente Signal vs Element Signal vs Fluxer Signal vs Tuta Signal vs Cinny Signal vs Stoat Signal vs Quiet Signal vs Wire Signal vs Peergos Signal vs SAMA

Frequently asked questions

Is Signal or Zen more popular?

Signal has 29,352 GitHub stars and Zen has 4,225. Signal has the larger community by that measure.

Are Signal and Zen free?

Both are open source. Signal is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Zen under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Signal and Zen?

Signal is written in Kotlin and Zen in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Signal or Zen?

Choose Signal if you want the larger community (29,352 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Zen if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.