head to head · open source

Signal vs Cinny

Signal has 29,352 GitHub stars, 6,888 forks, 498 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Cinny has 3,893 stars, 578 forks, 354 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Signal leads on adoption by 654% (29,352 vs 3,893 stars). Signal is written in Kotlin under AGPL-3.0; Cinny is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Signal has attracted 23% as many forks as stars, Cinny 15%. Signal was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Signal ★ 29K Cinny ★ 3.9K category Security & Privacy

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Signal Cinny
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 3.9K
License AGPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Kotlin TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 6.9K ⑂ 578
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Signal if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Signal profile →

pick Cinny if

  • You want the Cinny feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Cinny fits your workflow better

full Cinny profile →

About Signal

Signal Android is a secure messaging application for Android devices that delivers private communication via end to end encryption. Developed by Signal Messenger, LLC, it operates within the broader Signal ecosystem, which includes official iOS and desktop clients. The app uses mobile data or Wi Fi to send and receive encrypted messages, voice calls, and video calls without relying on traditional SMS or telephony infrastructure.

read the full Signal overview →

About Cinny

Cinny is an open source Matrix client written in TypeScript under AGPL 3.0. It lives in the Matrix ecosystem and is presented as "yet another matrix client," focusing on a simple, elegant, and secure interface. Its stated goal is an instant messaging application that is easy for people and has a modern touch.

read the full Cinny overview →

More in Security & Privacy

Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K JumpServer ★ 32K

Related comparisons

puter vs signal mattermost vs signal signal vs ente puter vs mattermost puter vs ente mattermost vs ente puter vs element puter vs fluxer puter vs vault mattermost vs vault puter vs unkey mattermost vs unkey puter vs phase puter vs keyshade vault vs unkey mattermost vs phase puter vs projectdiscovery mattermost vs projectdiscovery keycloak vs projectdiscovery tailscale vs projectdiscovery puter vs tracecat mattermost vs tracecat keycloak vs tracecat tailscale vs tracecat

More Data Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Security & Privacy field.

Signal vs Puter Signal vs Mattermost Signal vs Ente Signal vs Element Signal vs Fluxer Signal vs Tuta Signal vs Zen Signal vs Stoat Signal vs Quiet Signal vs Wire Signal vs Peergos Signal vs SAMA

Frequently asked questions

Is Signal or Cinny more popular?

Signal has 29,352 GitHub stars and Cinny has 3,893. Signal has the larger community by that measure.

Are Signal and Cinny free?

Both are open source. Signal is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Cinny under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Signal and Cinny?

Signal is written in Kotlin and Cinny in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Signal or Cinny?

Choose Signal if you want the larger community (29,352 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Cinny if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.