head to head · open source

Signal vs pki

Signal has 29,361 GitHub stars, 6,891 forks, 498 open issues and last shipped yesterday. pki has 509 stars, 162 forks, 46 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Signal leads on adoption by 5,668% (29,361 vs 509 stars). Signal is written in Kotlin under AGPL-3.0; pki is written in Java under GPL-2.0. Signal has attracted 23% as many forks as stars, pki 32%. Signal was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Signal ★ 29K pki ★ 509 category Security & Privacy

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Signal pki
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 509
License AGPL-3.0 GPL-2.0
Written in Kotlin Java
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 6.9K ⑂ 162
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Signal if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Signal profile →

pick pki if

  • You want the pki feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and pki fits your workflow better

full pki profile →

About Signal

Signal Android is a secure messaging application for Android devices that delivers private communication via end to end encryption. Developed by Signal Messenger, LLC, it operates within the broader Signal ecosystem, which includes official iOS and desktop clients. The app uses mobile data or Wi Fi to send and receive encrypted messages, voice calls, and video calls without relying on traditional SMS or telephony infrastructure.

read the full Signal overview →

About pki

Dogtag PKI is an enterprise class open source Certificate Authority suite, written in Java and licensed under GPL 2.0, for administrators who need to run their own certificate lifecycle infrastructure rather than buy it as a hosted service.

read the full pki overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

puter vs signal mattermost vs signal signal vs ente puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs ente mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authentik better-auth vs authentik jumpserver vs teleport puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault vault vs infisical puter vs unkey mattermost vs unkey puter vs phase puter vs keyshade

More Data Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Security & Privacy field.

Signal vs Puter Signal vs Mattermost Signal vs Ente Signal vs Element Signal vs Fluxer Signal vs certificates Signal vs Tuta Signal vs Zen Signal vs Cinny Signal vs Certipy Signal vs Stoat Signal vs Quiet

Frequently asked questions

Is Signal or pki more popular?

Signal has 29,361 GitHub stars and pki has 509. Signal has the larger community by that measure.

Are Signal and pki free?

Both are open source. Signal is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and pki under GPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Signal and pki?

Signal is written in Kotlin and pki in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Signal or pki?

Choose Signal if you want the larger community (29,361 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose pki if its feature set, stack or GPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.